Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kenny Bunk

Please do enlighten us on the nature of police misconduct in OJ’s case. I’m just dying to hear it.


35 posted on 03/27/2015 3:47:11 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna
Fred, my good man, you must parse my posts more carefully, I said "allegèd police misconduct."

Indeed,IIRC, that was the gravamen of the OJ defense team's case. They convinced the jury (LOL) that the cops had (a) "contaminated" the evidence, (b) probably "planted the evidence" anyway and (c) by not following proper procedures in the chain of custody, had mishandled and corrupted the evidence that they had probably planted. The jury (ROTFLMAO) bought it. OJ walked.

In OJ's case, police misconduct was not real. In Foxy Knoxy's case, it was real enough. Nevertheless, it's what got them both off in the end. BTW, many contributors on this thread may be a bot too quick to condemn Amanda's prosecutors. In the OJ case, the prosecution was equally corrupt and inept. The difference: Poor prosecution worked to his benefit, OJ walked right away. It worked against Amanda, so she had to wait to walk.

122 posted on 03/28/2015 5:49:39 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk ( Obama told us what he'd do, and did it. How about your Republican Representative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson