OK, then, I guess Knox is entirely innocent.
I suppose her claim that she saw a local businessman commit the murder was just an innocent misunderstanding. And she kept changing her story because she’s just a misunderstood person.
And, of course, the mix of her blood with the victim’s blood in the apartment was due to an entirely innocent set of circumstances.
The bloody footprints that matched hers and her boyfriend’s, her boyfriend’s DNA on the victim’s bra clasp, the DNA of both Kercher and Knox on the knife at Sollecito’s apartment - all evidence that can innocently be explained away somehow.
On second thought... Nope. Not buying into the Not Guilty verdict. It doesn’t add up.
My sympathy goes to the family of Meredith Kercher.
There is no mix of her blood. Not true. Her DNA was not at the crime scene. Bloody footprints were linked to Guede. Why are we repeating lies?