[Jacquerie]

I thought I had seen it all, until I read a freeper post that feared Scotus would throw out any amendment involving congressional term limits or brought the states back to the senate.

[demshateGod]

I thought I saw it all, until I read that a Republican appointed Chief Justice said that government can force citizens to buy something because a penalty was actually a tax even though the authors of the bill consistently claimed it wasn’t. Or that “shall not be infringed” means forced to pay 100.00 for training, another 150.00 to be brought into a police station, photographed, finger printed, and put on a list that the governor can make public anytime he wants.

In all seriousness, I truly can’t imagine why you guys think SCOTUS will honor these amendments. You admit they’re lawless right?