Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

They weren’t disparaging remarks about Iowa. They were disparaging remarks about Democrats who claimed to be shocked to learn Iowa families were making money off the ethanol subsidy.


9 posted on 03/18/2015 4:46:14 PM PDT by mak5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mak5

Of course the massive tsunami of anger directed at Walker for hiring a pro-amnesty supporter had absolutely nothing to do with any of this.

Right?


12 posted on 03/18/2015 4:49:54 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: mak5

They weren’t disparaging remarks about Iowa. They were disparaging remarks about Democrats who claimed to be shocked to learn Iowa families were making money off the ethanol subsidy.


Source please?! I don’t see disparaging remarks about democrats who claimed shocked to learn Iowa families were making money off ethanol subsidy as stated reason in this s article nor a Breibart article states.


30 posted on 03/18/2015 5:18:15 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Make 'em squeal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson