Posted on 03/16/2015 6:52:32 PM PDT by Nachum
Obama administration investigators now have everything they need to provide Congress with Lois Lerners emails, The Daily Caller has learned.
Treasury Department deputy inspector general Timothy Camus last testified that his office found more than 30,000 of Lerners emails, including emails from 2011 that were on a backup tape at a storage facility in West Virginia that the IRS never went to. (RELATED: Search For Lerner Emails On Hold Over Software Problems).
But Camus said that the investigation was on hold because his office was haggling over licensing issues with a company that makes special software that Camus said he needs to match the emails on the new tapes with the emails that have already been turned over to the House Oversight Committee. Camus said he just needed to make sure that he wasnt giving Congress emails that it already had.
The Daily Caller has confirmed that the Treasury inspector generals office has received the special software and is in the process of using it to match the emails.
Camus is now perfectly capable of matching those emails and handing them over to Congress in a timely fashion.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
BTTT
2015 is shaping up to be the Year Of The Email Message isnt it!
Lerners first and the MRS CLINTONS
I sense this is going to be a very entertaining spring in many respects..If obie doesnt shut down the internet
The crystal ball says Mrs Clintons email will be found also!
The Clinton Foundation is the thimble. It will be found and sew them both to the wall.
Obama has a family trust. Expect donations soon from Clinton camp (black-male funded)
Any year now.
Jedi mind tricks - “These aren’t the emails you are looking for!”
Anybody who knows a basic amount of computer hardware would have known from the start that it was all one big lie.
These are the Clinton’s your talking about.
Those Email are long gone - at least those that count. And with no chain of custody anything that is found elsewhere can’t be proven to be legit. How are you ever going to prove who actually sent them without having a record from the source? A source they had total control of outside any other legal authority.
There will be a flood of other Email just to give it all plausible deniability... And then it will be “old news”...
“At this point what difference does it make?”
It’s good thing the White House office to delete its FOIA regulations ,just in time ,LOL
Here they are in the White House basement...working on decoding the e-mails.....
Ha...LOL....a keeper (no pun intended)
That's odd. The IRS (THEIRS!) has never had any trouble blowing tax payer dollars on anything they feel like before...
And this whole time, I thought her emails were lost because her hard disk crashed. Amazing. Grubered again.
Didn’t Obama just rewrite the rules on FOIA with his handy dandy pen??
Thank you!
Nothing will happen in any of these investigative cover ups, Congress, and the leadership of both parties are involved up to their necks. THEY ARE COMPLICIT, if they weren’t they would operate under these guidelines:
Congress has ALL the power in washington, the executive and judicial branch operate according to the whims of CONGRESS!
Congress can Remove the President
Congress can remove the head of every executive agency
Congress can remove ALL of their employees
Congress can Abolish every agency they so choose
Congress can remove EVERY JUDGE IN AMERICA, including every supreme court justice.
Congress can abolish every federal court except the supreme Court
Congress can decide which cases the Judicial Branch can hear and decide
CONGRESS can Imprison ANYONE they want for any reason they so desire for as long as they wish.
Congress can declare WAR
No other governing body has even 10% of the power CONGRESS has!!
CONGRESS IS ALLOWING ALL OF IT!!!
Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)
If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.
Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.
Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.
Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.
Some references
[1] Joseph Storys Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html
[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html
[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html
73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934)
https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit
[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear.
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html
[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf
[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement
http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.