Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC: Broadband Providers Not Entitled to First Amendment Protections
CNS ^ | March 12, 2015 | Rudy Takala

Posted on 03/13/2015 6:09:33 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Tzimisce
If Congress can't do it, neither can the FCC.

Here's the PRIMARY problem in a nutshell.

The Government running America is "out of control" in the sense that segments of it are being systematically taken over step-by-step. No one seems to want to step in front of the speeding train to try and STOP it. That would take LEADERSHIP.

We've already seen the Government, more or less, take over the healthcare system, now the Internet, and along with the FED they own the big banks, and the BSA is filtering the entire communications system.

America is rapidly being transformed into a TOTALLY GOVERNMENT controlled Country with MANY, MANY NEW RULES & REGULATIONS.

61 posted on 03/13/2015 1:55:35 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
If Congress can't do it, neither can the FCC.

Here's the PRIMARY problem in a nutshell.

The Government running America is "out of control" in the sense that segments of it are being systematically taken over step-by-step. No one seems to want to step in front of the speeding train to try and STOP it. That would take LEADERSHIP.

We've already seen the Government, more or less, take over the healthcare system, now the Internet, and along with the FED they own the big banks, and the NSA is filtering the entire communications system.

America is rapidly being transformed into a TOTALLY GOVERNMENT controlled Country with MANY, MANY NEW RULES & REGULATIONS.

62 posted on 03/13/2015 1:57:02 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028
False connection between TV and internet? I wasn’t aware there was some false connection. I am aware however that TV and internet both are the exact same thing: the transmission of data.

That's true. Video is data.

It's just that TV is an obsolete way to transmit it. Folks are figuring that out in droves. And that creates a problem for today's ISPs, because most of them, at least at the residential level, are also cable TV providers, having started out in that business before the internet.

I have 50-up/50-down from Verizon, but no TV. They keep sending me offers to upgrade to TV. But I think the next piece to go will be the land line telephone. Because, after all, telephony is just transmission of data, too! And it's silly to bucket it out as a separate service.

63 posted on 03/13/2015 1:59:19 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The FCC, by and large, is Constitutionally unsupportable and most of what they do cannot be supported by the Constitution. The FCC should be abolished. Since a snowball in hell has a better chance than that, states should nullify unconstitutional FCC acts, which this almost certainly will be, and figure out a work-around to FCC control of the internet.


64 posted on 03/13/2015 2:20:22 PM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

We’ve reached the point where the states are the only enforcer of the Constitution by nullification.


65 posted on 03/13/2015 2:23:23 PM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

I wish that just ONE state would issue a ruling or legislation explaining why the Telecommunications Act of 1996 is unconstitutional and, therefore, is nullified and rejected, the citizens of that state are not subject to its constraints or penalties.

Once over the legal hurdle, then address the technical hurdle of blocking or working around FCC internet control.


66 posted on 03/13/2015 2:31:57 PM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Bump


67 posted on 03/13/2015 4:29:09 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

What do they mean “Not yet?” Since when is there a waiting period for rights? I suppose only illegals get “first amendment rights.”


68 posted on 03/13/2015 4:29:47 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Already ‘settled law’ with bakeries not allowed to deny queer wedding cake.


69 posted on 03/13/2015 5:54:03 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (/s /s /s /s /s, my replies are "liberally" sprinkled with them behind every word and letter.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

FCC = Federal Communications Commission

Communications:

Is that MY mouth, MY pencil, MY postings, MY finger?

They all send a message!


70 posted on 03/13/2015 5:58:01 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (/s /s /s /s /s, my replies are "liberally" sprinkled with them behind every word and letter.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"Death to America!"


71 posted on 03/13/2015 6:44:02 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xzins
The fairness doctrine (leftist speech control, aka obamanet) of the internet is being initiated and Congress, as usual, is doing and saying nothing even though they are supposed to be conservative representatives, which they no longer are.

Conservatives need to start a new party, you can not clean up the filthy old corrupt rino liberal bucket of fools.

72 posted on 03/14/2015 5:13:18 PM PDT by kindred (Only God is good, Christ is Lord and Saviour of all who believe only on Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
So unelected bureaucrats can now decide that government has a “compelling interest” allowing Constitutional rights to be overridden.

It's getting extremely close to the point that ordinary citizens defend their God given rights by using the 2nd Amendment at their disposal.

Tyrants deserve nothing less than death IMO.

73 posted on 03/15/2015 3:11:38 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

In the ultimate analysis, it is we, the people who interpret the Constitution. Because it is we who are given to determine when a government has exceeded the power authorized it by the Constitution.

And it is we who are expected to rein in the government if necessary.


74 posted on 03/15/2015 4:22:51 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xzins
This administration is soooo stuck in 1933.


75 posted on 03/15/2015 5:04:55 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson