America-phobic Bullies Target Old Glory

Some wonder why conservatives get the impression that many leftists are not patriotic. Well, how about their belief that the ideas of nationalism and patriotism are noxious? We told you!

As you've probably heard by now, Associated Students of the University of California, Irvine voted to ban the American flag from an "inclusive" space on campus. Don't you just love loaded liberal words, such as "inclusive," which mean the opposite of what they imply? Is the American flag includable there?

The language of the bill, passed by a vote of 6-4, with two abstentions (some real courage there), asserts that flags "construct cultural mythologies and narratives that in turn charge nationalistic sentiments" and that "flags construct paradigms of conformity and sets (sic) homogenized standards for others to obtain which in this country typically are idolized as freedom, equality, and democracy."

Before proceeding, let me pause briefly to thank my parents for raising me to recognize such psychobabble for what it is and God for the discernment to filter it. This kind of thinking is amazing but is the logical extension of modern leftism.

To quote the old Ginsu knife ad, "But wait; there's more." The bill also claims that the American flag "has been flown in instances of colonialism and imperialism" and that "symbolism has negative and positive aspects that are interpreted differently by individuals." Well, what do you know? People have different interpretations? What could be more dangerous?

Now for the zinger -- and where this line of thinking often ends up: "Freedom of speech, in a space that aims to be as inclusive as possible can be interpreted as hate speech."

Following the disturbing preamble, the bill includes these resolutions: "Let it be resolved that ASUCI make every effort to make the Associated Students main lobby space as inclusive as possible ... that no flag, of any nation, may be hanged on the walls of the Associate Student (sic) main lobby space ... (and) that if a decorative item is in the Associate student (sic) lobby space and issues arise, the solution will be to remove the item if there is considerable request to do so."

These are your tax dollars at work, training students to be ready for a job upon graduation -- at community organizing.

After news reports of this insanity, Breitbart News spoke to a UCI student who said she had heard a member of the ASUCI discussing "the (American) flag and how it triggered people." "Trigger," she said, was the word the person used, as in "the flag triggers me." Oh, boy. She speculated that one motivation for the student bill was to prevent "illegal citizens" from feeling bad.

To their credit, UCI administrators stated that they did not endorse the bill, calling its passage a "misguided decision," and the student body's executive cabinet vetoed the bill.

But the controversy and angst over the matter continue as a group of university professors signed a letter supporting the students who attempted to ban the flag. Their rationale? They wrote, "U.S. nationalism often contributes to racism and xenophobia, and ... the paraphernalia of nationalism is in fact often used to intimidate." And: "We admire the courage of the resolution's supports amid this environment of political immaturity and threat, and support them unequivocally."

I am not sure what these pointy-heads are referring to with "political immaturity and threat," but it's obvious that -- typical of leftists -- they are projecting. You will notice that the intolerance, immaturity "hate" and agitation involved in this brouhaha are coming from those denouncing Old Glory, not those displaying it proudly. These malcontents said not just "nationalism" but "U.S. nationalism," and they didn't show a smidgen of concern for the free expression rights of those displaying the flag.

This is the very mentality that leads people such as President Obama to mock the notion of American exceptionalism. They have a desire to defer important national matters to international bodies, have a gross underappreciation for the U.S. Constitution and advocate open borders. They see themselves as citizens of the world, perhaps more than of the United States.

Why would you care about people flooding illegally across our borders if you are not keen on protecting America's unique system of liberty? Why would you want immigrants to be required to go through a naturalization process whereby they learn the basics of American civics in order to attain citizenship if you don't believe our system is special?

I'll tell you what is offensive and unacceptable, and that is the ongoing distortion of the language employed by these bullies to suggest that positive pride in our nation equates to fear and hatred of foreigners and racism. This is outrageously false, and only those who think that way are capable of accusing others of such warped thinking.

If you believe that the American flag is offensive and emblematic of racism and xenophobia, what's next? Are you going to suggest that we fundamentally transform the United States of America?

Importantly, the Socialist International is an organization of leftist political parties from around the world. In 2010, 70 US congressmen and senators were identified by the American Socialist party as belonging to the SI. Many of them were subsequently kicked out of office. So those that remain are careful to publicly distance themselves from the SI, even if they adhere to its doctrines.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_International

http://www.wnd.com/2010/08/191605/

Importantly, one of the primary doctrines of the SI is the abolition of nations, as such. It imagines nations as artificial constructs that only cause strife, war, xenophobia and hatred. Therefore no socialist can *ever* be called “patriotic”.

Their means to destroy nations are first, open borders, to flood a given nation with third and fourth world immigrants, offering them vast amounts of welfare in exchange for supporting that nation’s socialist party.

Second, to vastly overspend the money of the nation, leaving it impoverished and with an insurmountable debt.

Third, to destroy all religious, cultural and social institutions, and corrupting what is taught by taking over all education. The nation must be made as generic as possible, with no inner cohesion. Likewise the news media is turned into a Department of Truth.

Fourth, to discourage success or failure, the former by tearing down those who are successful, and the latter by denying that their failure is failure.

Fifth, genocide through abortion and euthanasia of those the socialists deem to inferior and unwanted people.

So the bottom line is that the Democrat party in the US is now wholly socialist in its agenda, though they cower in fear of being recognized as such and kicked out.

Conservatives on campus can make this very bad for the board using their own words:

“Let it be resolved that ASUCI make every effort to make the Associated Students main lobby space as inclusive as possible ... (and) that if a decorative item is in the Associate student (sic) lobby space and issues arise, the solution will be to remove the item if there is considerable request to do so.”

Anything - ANYTHING - that anyone brings into the main lobby space should immediately be submitted as an issue and required to be removed.

flags, posterboards, displays, bake sales, posters, pictures, potted plants, furniture - everything. Have them all submitted as an issue item for some trumped up discriminatory/biased/historically wrong cultured reason and force their removal. Dust bunnies should be submitted as being anti-rabbit. Leave the room a cold empty chamber that no one wants to be in until the board owns up to their idiocy.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.