Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/12/2015 7:09:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Its criminal


2 posted on 03/12/2015 7:18:21 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Most people in normal IT and media are not fully privy to the requirements of NSA or other 3 letter agency “secure” communications for transmission of TS and above that say a Secretary of State might need to do his/her job.

This isn’t just encryption schemes between servers and/or end users - it is a comprehensive and rigorous process that necessitates separation of secure and nonsecure traffic from end to end, and complete physical layer encryption from end-to-end/

In other words, to just say her email/server setup was ‘secure’ is most likely bullshit, further complicated by the fact there were many email accounts on her server. And to say or imply that all this could have comingled secure and unsecure person traffic is patently ludicrous. Her ‘setup’ did not have, nor could have that capability, frankly.


4 posted on 03/12/2015 7:21:53 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
It might even be disqualifying.

Who determines that, anyone? For 'Rats, if the voters vote for them, then they are qualified. Homicide? Need not matter (as it didn't here in MA for Dead Kennedy).

5 posted on 03/12/2015 7:22:59 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
To put what she did in perspective imagine the following scenario in WWII:

1. Admiral Nimitz radios battle instructions to his Navy before the battle of Midway Island.
2. Although he had encryption he sent the battle plans out over the radio without encryption.
3. The Japanese defeated us at Midway because they knew our battle plans.

The above scenario is no different than what Hillary Clinton did as Secretary of State. Her server was vulnerable. Her server would be one of the number one targets for Russia, Korea, Iran etc. They have some of the best hackers. Without the very best of protection, which she did not have, there is no doubt her server was hacked. In effect her actions have given aid and comfort to our enemies.

Nimitz would have been court martialed, convicted and hung.

6 posted on 03/12/2015 7:24:06 AM PDT by cpdiii (DECKHAND, ROUGHNECK, GEOLOGIST, PILOT, PHARMACIST, LIBERTARIAN The Constitution is worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Her office said the system used “robust protections” and “additional upgrades and techniques employed over time as they became available.”

Who performed the upgrades and monitored the server?
Do they have the required security clearances??

7 posted on 03/12/2015 7:25:04 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hillary hasn’t told the truth in 60+++ years.

WHY should anyone believe her now? Why should I trust a women who’s ‘best friend’ is a Muslim woman???

Think about all the skullduggery she & Bill have wrought over the years. Ask Jennifer Flowers what kind of person Hillary is.


11 posted on 03/12/2015 7:46:34 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hillary hasn’t told the truth in 60+++ years.

WHY should anyone believe her now? Why should I trust a women who’s ‘best friend’ is a Muslim woman???

Think about all the skullduggery she & Bill have wrought over the years. Ask Jennifer Flowers what kind of person Hillary is.


12 posted on 03/12/2015 7:49:32 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If she ever told the truth it would kill her.


17 posted on 03/12/2015 9:28:18 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
“I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email,” Clinton averred at a brief press conference on Tuesday.

It looks like she was reading from notes when she made the above statement and it was interesting that she carefully confined her assertion to "sending" email and not to "receiving" email with classified information. As with her husband, all words used or not used are important.

20 posted on 03/12/2015 10:22:40 AM PDT by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson