Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/12/2015 7:07:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Time to pull out the “Rape of Nanking” to get a good understanding of how the Chinese will see this as payback.

I cannot say that I blame them too much.

I bet we sit this out.

Or is this why we are not getting entangled with ISIS...we can only be one place at a time now.


2 posted on 03/12/2015 7:16:14 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (When you are inclined to to buy storage boxes, but contractor bags instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
What if you don’t like the idea of the US being involved in a war with China? Well stop buying anything made in China. The US takes 17% of China’s exports and if that dried up, the Chinese economy would shrink by 4.5%. The social dislocation that would cause might be enough to topple the warhawk who is driving the Chinese aggression Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/03/why_china_will_lose_the_war_it_is_planning.html#ixzz3UBJBPseK Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Actually, that action, if it happened, might be the trigger that would cause the war. They would have no choice, just as Japan in 1941.

3 posted on 03/12/2015 7:24:47 AM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

PRC, just like Putin’s sabre rattling has more to do with internal generation of support for a regime no longer in good favor.

That does not mean the PRC will not attack these speck-o-islands.

If and once we get a responsible POTUS, they will not confront us. If anything, the Chinese understand history.


5 posted on 03/12/2015 7:25:04 AM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If the Chinese cowardly attack like this, they’ll lose and lose big.


7 posted on 03/12/2015 7:27:21 AM PDT by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The author lost me at “firstly”, and with “secondly” he twisted the knife. :O


10 posted on 03/12/2015 7:46:33 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The first casualty of a war with the ChiComs would be the end of "Free Trade" and MFN. A good thing. Then we can round up all of our "Free traitors" and hang them from telephone poles.

I will LOL when the ChiComs grab all of the USA manufacturing facilities in the name of the people and give US companies a "So Solly Charlie". Would be so good.

11 posted on 03/12/2015 7:54:25 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Gosh. A war with China. Maybe we can send in the Food Stamp Division followed closely by the Illegal Division and then send the Obamacare Division in on the right flank.


15 posted on 03/12/2015 8:25:42 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

At one time it was a certainty that we would oppose China if they were to attack Japan or Taiwan. Especially with an Obama or Clinton (or certain Repubs) in the White House, I don’t think its obvious at all we would oppose them. We might make impassioned speeches and move aircraft carriers around the Pacific, but actually pull the trigger and send Chinese boats and planes to the bottom, no.

They have already put us on notice that opposing them might cost us Los Angeles. And I believe a good percentage of American politicians have been coopted by the Chinese in any case.

But we should not be passive in the face of a Chinese push. They see their natural outer border as Guam.


18 posted on 03/12/2015 9:21:13 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Why China Will Lose the War It is Planning.

NOT WITH OUR PRESIDENT.


19 posted on 03/12/2015 9:30:43 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Big assumption: US/Japanese counterattack.

Japanese counterattack? Sure.

The Japanese aren’t stupid. If they aren’t ready for this, shame on them. I know how they feel about being Japanese, and about their homeland.

They may love the ‘Pease Constitution’, but they don’t live in windowless rooms. These folks live in a society that accepts that plans are made 100 years out. Families sign 100 year mortgages.

If you’re China, you’d better be ready. A single carrier isn’t going to get the job done either. Chinese amphibious capability is still not what it needs to be get it done either.

Would Japan use a nuke? Why not? It worked on them. Nobody adapts to new methods, techniques, and technologies more pridelessly than the Japanese. Any new idea, no matter where it comes from, is something they’ll adopt.


20 posted on 03/12/2015 9:38:52 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Nope. The juice isn't worth the squeeze. What China stands to lose out of such an encounter dwarfs whatever they might stand to gain in terms of territory and internal prestige.

It would certainly alter the world economy, though. Cheap manufactured goods, down. U.S. debt, canceled out. Foreign markets for those goods they still could produce, hostile. International finance, frozen. For a sprinkling of islands and maybe some potential oil assets in the Spratly islands that they couldn't exploit anyway? I don't think so. The Chinese are smarter than that.

Now, Taiwan, that's another matter. They might risk quite a lot for Taiwan.

27 posted on 03/12/2015 1:22:03 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson