Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grampa Dave

Rush got it right today. The left found Bill a loveable rogue. They find Hillary a venomous foul-mouthed wretch : )


20 posted on 03/11/2015 10:28:55 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: stephenjohnbanker

They find Hillary a venomous foul-mouthed wretch

....and drunk


21 posted on 03/11/2015 10:31:58 AM PDT by freedom6178
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: stephenjohnbanker; All

Hillary’s 55,000 pages of emails is a costly, logistical nightmare

http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/11/technology/security/hillary-email-paper/

“In an act of semi-transparency, Hillary Clinton has handed the State Department 55,000 pages of emails for public release — but in paper, not their original electronic format.

That complicates things.

By doing it that way, Clinton has made it harder and more expensive for the federal government to quickly review her emails and decide what’s OK for the public and what’s not.

It also makes it a lot harder to tell if Clinton’s telling the truth that she turned over all work-related emails. At a press conference at the United Nations on Tuesday, Clinton assured reporters that she provided “all my emails that could possibly be work-related.”

First, the cost. The State Department hasn’t said how much it’ll be. Trial lawyers say it’ll probably cost tens of thousands of dollars, but costs could quickly rise if multiple agencies become involved. Bloomberg reports that it could cost taxpayers more than $1 million.

The State Department will probably scan them all to make them digital again (a process that’s maybe 30 hours long). Then it’ll have to run optical character recognition software on it to make it searchable (up to another 30 hours). Then its lawyers will read them line-by-line to block out material deemed classified (taking a few weeks or months).

Trial lawyers who are used to suing big companies say this is a classic “data dump.” That’s when a company fighting a lawsuit attempts to slowdown opponents by drowning them in unorganized information that’s difficult to comb through.”......


22 posted on 03/11/2015 10:32:59 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Rush is 100% wrong. This is personality-driven. This is Obama, on a rage of personal destruction, intended to destroy Hillary.

If this controversy dies down, Obama has enough information that another will emerge. And another. And another. Until, at some point, Hillary is either under formal charges, or drops out.


23 posted on 03/11/2015 10:34:53 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The FCC takeover of the internet will quickly become a means to censorship of dissent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: stephenjohnbanker; freedom6178

You both are correct. Hill is a venomous foul-mouth drunk b$tch.


31 posted on 03/11/2015 2:02:57 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (When will Sisi, Bibi, King Abdullah & ?, take out Isis in our White House, AG Dept, CIA, & State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson