It’s the RINO branch of the GOP. Sort of like the liberal branch of the formerly Catholic Church.
It is so simple ... The Bible speaks ... either you believe and follow the Word of God or you don’t.
Progressives plan is to progress step by step if need be.
They form coherent logical sounding arguments that win over voters, I dont see that on our side.
Soft-headed nitwits wants to give out “rights and benefits” like handing out candy. They are smart enough to stop any think: “Where do these rights and benefits come from? Who pays for them?”
Has AllahPundit shed his RINO wonkiness yet? That was a lengthy non-informative post of his.
AllahPundit was known to be a RINO supporter during the 2008 and particularly the 2012 presidential elections. I was under the impression he just looooooooved him some Romney.
Ace from Ace of Spades HQ has started to come around since the midterms and the subsequent Boehner-McConnell disasters. I can’t be bothered to slog through all of the minutiae that AllahPundit spews to figure out any of his current positions, though.
And God is still opposed to marriage other than one man and one woman. And he’s opposed to abortion on demand.
So when the judgment comes it won’t matter what the polling organizations say, it will be settled and lots of people are going to be left cut off from the Holy One.
Freegards
LEX
RINO = DEMOCRAT
All this junk over 3% of the American population?????
Let them die off.
Now please note, I'm not against this, but it puzzles me that it now is focused in this direction, as if the media wanted it to, and didn't want the movement to really emphasize these fiscal/government spending/taxes aspect, as they would have a much harder time defending against it.
I think it's a trap, personally.
The media likes to wrap up all our important points into a nice little homophobic, racist bow. Notice how the meme of the week's news is the Oklahoma University fraternity, rather than Hillary or Obama?
Remember that Paulbots still claim the Tea Party is a libertarian movement.
Obviously it is not.
I find it suspicious that conservatives seem to be depicting the legitimacy of gay marriage as merely a matter of opinion. Given that the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay marriage, please consider the following hypothetical situation.
Even if everybody in the country supported gay marriage, it remains that there are no constitutionally enumerated gay rights to stop the states from making laws which prohibit gay marriage, as long as such laws dont unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated protections.