” ...He has had 6 months to supeona the “ physical server”, as well... “
Do you know for sure if Gowdy has the authority to issue a subpoena to seize personal property?
In all my many years of watching congressional investigations, I don’t ever recall seeing personal property being seized as evidence. Please correct me (anyone) if I’m wrong.
Personal property?
Hillary Clinton used her “personal property” to store government related
emails without forwarding those emails to a government server. That is illegal.
Am I a lawyer that can tell you one way or the other? No. I can’t.
But the Government related emails belong to the government. Period.
Hillary knew exactly what she was doing as evidenced by your question
to me. But why does that preclude Gowdy not even trying to get that server.
Now I have a question for you. Gowdy recently issued a supeona for the emails only. Who is going to enforce that grandstanding email supeona from Gowdy?
On a side note, a skilled prosecutor is all about timing.
They know when a witness will make the most impact on jury.
In this case, I am thinking of 2 points.
1. The sub-committee & chair Gowdy may have been more concerned about contents of Benghazi emails rather than which email server it was sent from.
2. If indeed incriminating evidence exists, bringing it out 20 months before election is tantamount to premature ejaculation. Voters are notorious for short memories.