Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muir_redwoods
If that's a serious question, if you're holding forth with a presence of authority and you ask if Wikipedia is biased, I'm sorry but we're done.

I would say so. Anyone that thinks Wikipedia is biased against illegal drugs is not a serious person.

A more likely explanation is you absolutely have no rebuttal to the fact that massive and legal drug imports kept coming into China, and destroyed that nation.

When the facts don't support your theory, it is the facts that must be thrown out. That's is your arguing methodology.

160 posted on 03/05/2015 11:40:27 AM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Here’s a fact; this isn’t 19th century China. Drugs are flooding this country today and the vast bulk of us don’t use them. Any explanation for that?


174 posted on 03/05/2015 12:04:14 PM PST by muir_redwoods ("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson