Skip to comments.
David Brock: ‘No Issue,’ No Oversight Problem With Hillary Emails
Breitbart.com ^
| 03/04/2015
| Ian Hanchett
Posted on 03/04/2015 11:39:22 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Jim Robinson
Laws are for the little people.
21
posted on
03/04/2015 12:02:10 PM PST
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“the problem we have is a manufactured controversy in the media, which started with yesterday’s New York Times”
Sounds like there’s a real catfight going on between Brooks and some reporter type at the Slimes. Lovers’ tiff, perhaps?
22
posted on
03/04/2015 12:06:17 PM PST
by
SharpRightTurn
(White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Let’s switch the name or party out to say, Condaleeza Rice or ANY republican administration official. David Brock, what say you then?
23
posted on
03/04/2015 12:06:54 PM PST
by
sappy
(criminaldems)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“The state department said yesterday that 55,000 pages of e-mails were turned over late last year in compliance with that law.”
If this is true, then why is Gowdy’s committee only now asking for them?
To: E. Pluribus Unum
25
posted on
03/04/2015 12:11:58 PM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: nikos1121
Their request was for State Department e-mails. It’s now revealed that Hillary used multiple private e-mail accounts for State Department business. Subpoenas are very specific.
She may have (did) conduct some SD business entirely within private accounts on her server.
There had to be address spoofing and government IT guys in on it.
26
posted on
03/04/2015 12:15:43 PM PST
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: Mr. Peabody
Is Valerie Jarret using private email?
Only when she is emailing Iran. (She was born there.)
27
posted on
03/04/2015 12:16:26 PM PST
by
RDasher
("El Nino is climate, La Nina is weather")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
And thus did David Brooks firmly establish himself as the Baghdad Bob of Clinton groupies.
Less Than 1K To Go!
Click The Pic To Donate
Please Donate!
29
posted on
03/04/2015 12:20:36 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Try that excuse with any other federal employee dealing with classified information and see what happens!
Lying sack-o-turds hypocrits!
30
posted on
03/04/2015 12:43:38 PM PST
by
vpintheak
(Call them what they are - regressive control-freaks)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
What a shock Clinton Brock sucker decides she is pure as the wind driven snow.
31
posted on
03/04/2015 12:44:49 PM PST
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Even if Hillary!™ produced 110% of the emails requested, the points are that using her personal account for official business was in clear violation of law, and the fact that the e-mail domain was insecure & hackable could lead to severe security problems.
You can tell that David Brooks is no Conservative just from the crease in his brain…
32
posted on
03/04/2015 12:47:56 PM PST
by
mikrofon
(Humpday BUMPty)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“That’s just Sandy” -Bill Clinton in response to Sandy Burglar stealing, destroying, and modifying documents.
Now it’s “That’s just Hillary.”
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
