Voters Unlikely to Care Much About the Hillary Clinton Email Furor

NY Times ^ | March 4, 2015 | Brendan Nyhan

[C19fan]

The report Monday that Hillary Clinton exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state raises a number of important questions about government transparency and access to public records.

Unsurprisingly, however, the conversation quickly veered from matters of policy into ominous speculation about the political consequences for Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic Party presidential front-runner, including hyperbolic suggestions that the emails could “shake up the 2016 race,” cause irreparable damage to her, cause her to lose the general election, or even help force her out of the race.

[NativeSon]

"Voters Unlikely to Care Much About the Hillary Clinton Email Furor"

Well, if the NYslimes has their way, sure, the media will crush the story and not report the facts and so it won't matter

[DoughtyOne]

Voters Unlikely to Care Much About the Hillary Clinton Email Furor

Only because they will never have the facts explained to them. The New Yack Times is too busy to deliver that news.

[dead]

The NY Times writes an opinion piece denigrating the significance of their own investigative story, because the target of the story is the next person they endorse for President.

Did you know that the NY Times has endorsed the Democratic candidate for President in the last 14 elections?

They will forevermore endorse the Democrat and this go round, that will likely be Hillary.

They realize now they made a terrible mistake pointing out a flaw in their candidate, so don't expect to happen again until after election day 2016.

[dead]