Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/04/2015 5:49:36 AM PST by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: raptor22
Emailgate should Disqualify Hillary Clinton For POTUS
but it doesn't.She is controllable, being herself incompetent, and will make a good cat's paw for the Oligarchs. That is what makes her qualified to be POTUS. If she is the Democrat candidate she will be the POTUS. Or some other unknown could be raised to the position. Unknowns are desirable because they bring no faction of their own to the position.
47 posted on 03/04/2015 6:29:15 AM PST by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22


48 posted on 03/04/2015 6:31:15 AM PST by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
Emailgate needs to be big enough to irritate Hillary ( about the size of her thighs), but not so humongous (like the size of her ass) that it keeps her from running.
49 posted on 03/04/2015 6:31:16 AM PST by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

I suspect the entire story, and its evolution, of the Los Angeles videographer story will now be discernible if we get the e-mails from Hillary’s server. If it shows a development of the fictitious story she will never survive such a report to run for president.


53 posted on 03/04/2015 6:34:03 AM PST by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

I don’t think the primary purpose of setting up her own e-mail was in order to hide criminal activity. Anything (else) against the law she would certainly not use e-mail to pursue.

Certainly one of the reasons was to provide her lawyers with an argument to not turn over e-mails, but perhaps there was an added benefit.

I think this particular ruse was also designed to obscure communications of a more personal nature.

Not necessarily her relationship with Huma Abedin, although that’s possible. Sidney Blumenthal also was on the network. Among things she might want to hide is her real relationship with Bill, something she wouldn’t want the American people to know. As an article at Powerline.com pointed out, the hdr in the e-mail address stands for Hillary Diane Rodham.

Even if only sub-consciously, Hillary had already begun, in 2009, to see herself as apart from Bill.

She and Bill have both lived secret lives for a long time. Must be agonizing psychologically to have to live this way. It shouldn’t surprise then, that she would need a secret internet presence, if only partly for emotional reasons.

In addition, could Hillary have been trying to hide things from Obama? After experiencing him during the Dem primary, could anyone fault her for that?


54 posted on 03/04/2015 6:34:32 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking; StopGlobalWhining; Straight Vermonter; Tampa Caver; TChris; ...

CULTURE OF CORRUPTION PING


56 posted on 03/04/2015 6:37:19 AM PST by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken or facebook.com/danielsobieski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Hillary probably leaked this story herself... She’s out there picking the low fruit - the ‘easy’ donors - for her retirement vacation slush fund... Oops, I mean her ‘foundation’...


58 posted on 03/04/2015 6:43:00 AM PST by GOPJ (Comrade Thug - please don't hurt me for disagreeing... I lived in a free country once..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Follow up on the subject. Basically, LOL. Does anybody believe that a mere email issue would put a stop to the hildebeast express? These lyin’, cheatin’, socialist, trash heaps are just doing what they do with no fear of consequences. To them it’s just standard operating procedure.


61 posted on 03/04/2015 7:00:52 AM PST by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

anyone who supports Hillary is knowingly supporting a criminal. But then again, most politicians are criminals as those in DC have so proved.


62 posted on 03/04/2015 7:02:35 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

when you’re already doing the Nixon thing before you’ve even taken the oath...


64 posted on 03/04/2015 7:12:29 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

One would think the 920 GOP FBI files in her possession would have disqualified her back in the 1990’s from being anything other than a convicted felon.

In a perfect world, maybe.

Meanwhile, in the Watergate era, didn’t Charles Colson go to prison for having just one FBI file in his possession?


66 posted on 03/04/2015 7:22:42 AM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (Say no to amnesty, say no to treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
Dem apologists for Clinton assert that the server was secure, physically protected by Secret Service agents protecting her home.

Now for some interesting questions: WHO was her system administrator? Did he have remote access? What security clearance level did he have, given that some of her emails probably contained sensitive information, if not top secret and beyond?

68 posted on 03/04/2015 8:23:28 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Let’s get Issa on the case right now!...that’ll strike fear in’em! /s


70 posted on 03/04/2015 8:31:05 AM PST by RckyRaCoCo (Shall Not Be Infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

This is more of the democrat party Kulture of Krime and Korruption.


73 posted on 03/04/2015 8:39:00 AM PST by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

It could very well be that someone in the Obama administration, possibly Obama himself, is leaking damaging information on Hillary. Obama and Hillary do not get along, and Obama wants Elizabeth Warren as his successor.


84 posted on 03/04/2015 2:21:53 PM PST by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

But the NSA has those records, don’t they?
Inasmuch as I am totally opposed to the NSA having any connection to the fiber trunks, they should serve as backup on government employees. Don’t know how to do that but it must be done.


86 posted on 03/04/2015 3:34:30 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Democrats: the Party of slavery to the immensely wealthy for over 200 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Nothing, absolutely nothing, will disqualify Hillary! from becoming POTUS.

The question is, why is she so well-loved and why does she always skate?

Just asking.

IMHO


89 posted on 03/05/2015 4:22:57 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson