Just a poor equivocation.
For the most part, these men don’t leave prison “gay”. They exit prison “on-the-down-low”.
Their activities support and re-enforce the prison-culture of domination over ^lesser-beings^; their proof is in violating weaker men. Note that the aforementioned weaker men are also prison-refugees...of any and all color.
Inside, they impress themselves on other men to survive lest they be violated themselves (think: pitchers and catchers).
Outside of prison, they find a need to validate their prison-time, as well as their primacy in the local neighborhood, by violating others who would agree with their “natural ascendancy”...male or female (prison-chic). That’s why the “droopy-drawers” has become a fashion statement.
It makes no difference. There is a “pool” of prison refugees for these folks who will dominate. Each interaction (AKA; rectal-penetration) is a validation of the prison culture’s “domination” ethos.
Look at the sub-saharan tribal culture of “domination”. The urban community in the USA is regressing to tribalism.
Are you defending homosexuals that do not go to prison - that it is not a choice for them?