Posted on 03/03/2015 5:44:58 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
I read the comments sections on my articles. One of the comments I see consistently is "I like Ted Cruz, but I am worried he is not constitutionally qualified to be president."
So I decided to look into the issue.
After doing some research, here's what I discovered:
Ted Cruz was born in Canada. He had (past tense) Canadian citizenship, which he was entitled to automatically, having been born in Canada, and which he has since renounced. He was also born with American citizenship. His mother was an American; his father was not.
The Constitution says any candidate for president must be 35 years of age, a resident within the United States for 14 years and a "natural born citizen."
The question then is, what is a natural born citizen? I don't think there is any doubt that being born abroad doesn't prevent Cruz from being a natural born citizen. If so, any children born to American parents while abroad wouldn't be Americans. That makes no sense. And to eliminate doubt, Congress expressly passed a law saying children of Americans born outside America were in fact natural born Americans.
The Nationality Act of 1940 outlines which children become nationals and citizens of the United States at birth. In addition to those who are born in the United States or born outside the country to parents who were both citizens or, interestingly, found in the United States without parents and no proof of birth elsewhere citizenship goes to babies born to one American parent who has spent a certain number of years here...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
No, that is what some of you said. Jerome Corsi said Obama was born in Kenya, then said Wilbur Davis Marshall father.
I have been consistent since 2008.
This crap that is not in the Constitution. Reading this makes my head hurt.
Natural law versus positive law.
Natural born citizens don't need positive (man made) law to establish citizenship.
It isn't that hard to understand and it isn't rocket science.
CRUZ was not born on US soil. This is what the dhimmicrats will say 24/7.
He is not elegible
CRUZ was not born on US soil. This is what the dhimmicrats will say 24/7.
He is not elegible
Rational analysis seems to have disappeared in many places.
“The question then is, what is a natural born citizen? I don’t think there is any doubt that being born abroad doesn’t prevent Cruz from being a natural born citizen. If so, any children born to American parents while abroad wouldn’t be Americans. That makes no sense. And to eliminate doubt, Congress expressly passed a law saying children of Americans born outside America were in fact natural born Americans.”
Acts of federal politicians not withstanding it makes no sense to have such a concept as “natural born Citizen” unless it is distinguished from anther kind of citizen
‘naturalized’ or otherwise.
Yet he says this earlier...
Under the law existing at the time of their birth, each became a citizen of the United States at birth. Rubio and Jindal by the 14th Amendment, Cruz by statute.
Isn't the 14th Amendment "some other method"?
Neither was Juan McCain...
If Obama was eligible to serve as President, then just about anybody is.
After OMuslim anybody who is willing to put their hand over their heart for the Pledge of Allegiance is eligible.
The British term natural born Subject as well as concepts of natural law were not clearly relied upon by the Framers, and are in themselves not clearly contradictory to this plain reading of the text.
Both the First and Second Amendments prove the emboldened portion of that statement to be totally absurd.
Nice compilation. However, as you might guess, I disagree with his conclusions.
Both of Thomas Jefferson’s parents died before the adoption of the Declaration of Independence, so they were not citizens of the United States.
his mother was an American citizen
if we do that, then there is no integrity and the Constitution is already dead.
REQUIRE , nay... DEMAND they adhere to the Constitution as it’s the LAW
Actually McCain was born in a hospital near where his father was stationed.
Juan was considered to have been born on US soil because of this.
Cruz was not born on US soil.
The fact that his father is or was a foreign national disqualifies him
For your edification...
Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Weren't they dead before the Constitution was signed too?
Wasn't BHO Sr. a foreign national here on a student visa?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.