That one 2013 interview where the question “Could you envision.....” followed by his answer “Sure, it makes sense.....” was a very big sticking point I had with him.
I detest ANY politician who plays games with the word “Amnesty” and contorts it to fit their personal views of how they’re would ‘pathway illegals to citizenship’.
This interview with Wallace (a closet liberal) makes a pretty clear statement that he’s changed his mind on that and dispels the notion that his version of Amnesty might contain some aspect of ‘pathway’ and that he would not allow it as a President.
Hopefully, this just isn’t him changing his tune but not his heart. Nonetheless, it is very encouraging.
I’d have a discussion with you but for the fact that you label Walker a “closet liberal” which makes it fruitless to pursue a rational dialogue.
I imagine that Scott Walker is a good poker player.
You got to ask yourself...do you allow politicians to change their minds like the rest of us do? There is no such thing as an honest and rational person who doesn’t occasionally change their mind. To expect otherwise is to invite disappointment.
As for amnesty, I think its a nonissue anyway. The uniparty is firmly behind it and will figure out a way to jam it down our throats well before November 2016.
And as a sadder but wiser Rubio said at CPAC: the lesson he learned from sucking up to Schumer on amnesty is that no matter what caveats they put in the bill, Americans DO NOT believe the govt will do any of it (to protect Americans).