The fact is that Hillary started the lie about the video. Why?
To protect Obama? Does anyone think she would risk herself to protect the guy that beat her out of the Democrat presidential nomination?
No.
To protect any part of the United States? When has Hillary ever done anything to sacrifice herself for any part of the United States?
No.
To protect herself. The history of Hillary Clinton is a series of actions taken by herself to protect and enrich herself.
Yes. Hillary lied about the video to try and protect herself. From what?
Well, the lie was to show why somebody had attacked American personnel and interests in Libya. Hillary lied to cover up the reason an enemy attacked us in Libya. Why?
She was trying to protect any part of the United States. We have already determined that Hillary does not take action to help the United States.
No.
She was trying to protect her actions in Libya.
Yes. That is how she operates.
What was Hillary trying to protect about herself in Libya?
She was trying to protect her reputation because she had been incompetent in protect US personnel and property in Libya. She knew Obama and the press would never confront her about her competence.
No.
Because she had done something illegal. While incompetence could be covered up, even the Democrat Party would have a hard time looking away from any criminal actions Hillary had taken in Libya. Especially if those actions were major felonies or treasonous.
Yes.
Hillary concocted a story about a video causing the attack on American interests in Benghazi to cover-up her criminal actions in Libya.
The explanation is logically consistent.
The explanation agrees with experience.
The explanation is “economical”. It is brief.
For one thing (by no means the only thing) this...
Blow-by-Blow: How Obama & Hillary Left Americans to Die"Nordstrom further testified in writing that Hillary Clinton waived security requirements for the Benghazi consulate despite high and critical threat levels in the six categories of security standards established under the Overseas Security Policy Board and the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999. The waiver can only be authorized by the Secretary of State, who cannot delegate that responsibility to someone else. ”If the Secretary of State did not waive these requirements, who did so by ordering occupancy of the facilities in Benghazi and Tripoli?” Nordstrom wrote."
Some other reasons...
Hillary's Treason.Hillary might have committed her own treason during the attack.
EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say October 26, 2012 | Jennifer Griffin
Whistleblower: Hillary cut State’s counter-terrorism bureau out of Benghazi loop 05/06/2013 | Ed Morrissey