Posted on 02/23/2015 11:17:28 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
When Barack Obama was first elected president, a number of my readers were in deep despair about American politics and the state of our culture. So I set out to compile an inventory of what is still going right with our culture, the reserves of strength we were going to have to draw on to survive the Obama era.
One of my examples was Mike Rowes show Dirty Jobs. That led to some further ruminations about why people on the right tend to gravitate to shows like his, which celebrate the value of work.
Rowe himself has been understandably cautious about wading into politicswhy risk alienating a big portion of his audience? (One wishes other celebrities were so circumspect.) But very recently, he has begun to indicate where his sympathies lie. There is the Facebook post I mentioned above about the minimum wage, which shows a strong, concrete understanding of the basic operation of the free market. And then there is a subsequent post in which he responds to a question about whether Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker should be disqualified from running for president because he didnt graduate from college. (Walker left in his senior year to take a job offer.)
Rowe begins with a long and very funny description of how he got his first television job for the online shopping network QVC. Its subtle, but you might also notice that he makes an implicit comparison between the job of president and that of a QVC pitchman. He concludes with an argument against confus[ing] qualifications with competency.
Given that not president since Reagan hasnt been a graduate of either Harvard or Yaleand they havent even gotten close to matching the results of the bumpkin who graduated from Eureka Collegeits certainly reasonable to suspect that those Ivy League credentials arent all theyre cracked up to be.I think the stigmas and stereotypes that keep so many people from pursuing a truly useful skill begin with the mistaken belief that a four-year degree is somehow superior to all other forms of learning. And I think that making elected office contingent on a college degree is maybe the worst idea Ive ever heard.
But the whole controversy isnt really about Scott Walkers qualifications. Its about something deeper.
On the surface, of course, its certainly about Scott Walker. The left-leaning mainstream media senses that hes a potential danger. After all, he has won three straight elections in a swing state, while challenging the public employees unions head-on and significantly reducing their government privileges. (This is precisely what makes him interesting to those of us on the right.) The mainstream media feel that they need to disqualify him now, so theyre looking for anything they can use against him.
But behind that, there is a more visceral reaction. The real purpose of higher education is to learn the knowledge and skills required for success later in life. So if someone has already become a success, whether or not he went to college is irrelevant. If he has achieved the end, what does it matter that he didnt do it by way of that specific means? But for the mainstream elites, particularly those at the top level in the media, a college education is not simply a means to an end. It is itself a key attainment that confers a special social status.
There are no real class divisions in America except one: the college-educated versus the non-college educated. It helps to think of this in terms borrowed from the world of a Jane Austen novel: graduating from college is what makes you a gentleman. (A degree from an Ivy League school makes you part of the aristocracy.) It qualifies you to marry the right people and hold the right kind of positions. It makes you respectable. And even if you dont achieve much in the world of work and business, even if youre still working as a barista ten years later, you still retain that special status. Its a modern form of genteel poverty, which is considered superior to the regular kind of poverty.
If you dont have a college degree, by contrast, you are looked down upon as a vulgar commoner who is presumptuously attempting to rise above his station. Which is pretty much what theyre saying about Scott Walker. This prejudice is particularly strong when applied to anyone from the right, whose retrograde views are easily attributed to his lack of attendance at the gentlemans finishing school that is the university.
That brings us to the heart of the matter. I have observed before that left-leaning politics has become part of the cultural class identity of college-educated people, a prejudice that lingers long after they have graduated. You can see how this goes the other way, too. If to be college-educated is to have left-leaning viewsthen to have the correct political values, one must be college-educated.
You can see now what is fueling the reaction on the left. If Scott Walker can run for president, he is challenging the basic cultural class identity of the mainstream left. He is more than a threat to the Democrats hold on political power. He is a threat to the existing social order.
They’ll try.
Not so sure they’ll get him, though.
The reason they’ve been successful in the past is because the candidates played their game.
The Elitist Left demands a college degree, preferably Ivy League. They will paint him as a small town hick. A hillbilly.
I have an opinion. I changed my opinion. I believe I made that change for valid reasons.
Doesn’t mean I’m “wise”.
I only hope I’m right.
Oh, too much break in the cuffs... that just won’t do. That just won’t do at all.. /s
But without the legions of hacks stationed in DC, who would regulate the economy to death, tax the taxpayers into poverty and spend away the countries future in frivolous, worthless programs?
It’s a tough job, but somebody’s got to do it.
” But behind that, there is a more visceral reaction. The real purpose of higher education is to learn the knowledge and skills required for success later in life. So if someone has already become a success, whether or not he went to college is irrelevant. If he has achieved the end, what does it matter that he didnt do it by way of that specific means? But for the mainstream elites, particularly those at the top level in the media, a college education is not simply a means to an end. It is itself a key attainment that confers a special social status.”
Excellent!
Elites do think this way, while many Americans with a degree don’t size people up this way. Hard working Americans understand that it’s not where you’ve been, but where you are going that matters.
Walker does not support the sort of amnesty that Obama & Harry Reid have been pushing. Back in 2006 when Walker was County Administrator, our leftist County Board floated a meaningless resolution an immigration reform plan with a very limited amnesty. Walker didn’t oppose it as he knew it was going nowhere.
I doubt he supports anything like amnesty now.
They try that with everyone who is not a hate America or hate Christianity type.
I believe it was wise.
Wetbacks?
Not worth your time on these threads.
Lol, you fail. Try again
Walker does not support the sort of amnesty that Obama & Harry Reid have been pushing. Back in 2006 when Walker was County Administrator, our leftist County Board floated a meaningless resolution an immigration reform plan with a very limited amnesty. Walker didn’t oppose it as he knew it was going nowhere.
I doubt he supports anything like amnesty now.
Excellent!
Well, thanks.
No. YOU try again.
I know he is. I did my own research. He fails.
Let me make a few calls. I know a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy and maybe he can set something up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.