Posted on 02/21/2015 9:08:09 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Some of the most prominent reformers have argued for years that the ideological and theological roots of Islamist extremism must be addressed, a topic administration officials carefully avoided during a three-day summit this week. Reformers also say the White House is hurting its own efforts by working with people who sympathize with the goals of violent extremist groups, if not their methods.
"We have to own the issue of extremist Islamic theology in order to defeat it and remove it from our world. We have to name it to tame it," Muslim journalists Asra Nomani and Hala Arafa wrote in an essay published Friday by the Daily Beast.
"Among Muslims, stuck in face-saving, shame-based cultures, we need to own up to our extremist theology instead of always reverting to a strategy of denial, deflection and demonization."
Nomani, a former Wall Street Journal reporter, was close friends with her colleague Daniel Pearl, who was kidnapped and beheaded by Islamist extremists in Pakistan in 2002.
At the summit, President Obama and other officials made clear they believe that there is no link between Islam and the Islamist extremist groups that have been at the forefront of a dramatic spike in terrorist violence worldwide over the past year.
"Al Qaeda and [the Islamic State] and groups like it are desperate for legitimacy. They try to portray themselves as religious leaders — holy warriors in defense of Islam," Obama said Wednesday.
"We must never accept the premise that they put forward, because it is a lie. Nor should we grant these terrorists the religious legitimacy that they seek. They are not religious leaders — they’re terrorists. And we are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam."
Among the goals of the summit were empowering community leaders to help Muslims resist the extremists' message and improved strategies to communicate a more moderate message. But the administration's refusal to clearly identify the threat — and the exclusion of those who do from the conversation — works against meeting those goals, reformers said.
Maajid Nawaz, a former Islamist radical and co-founder of the Quilliam Foundation, an anti-extremist British think-tank, calls it the "Voldemort effect," after the villain in the Harry Potter books whose name could not be mentioned.
Nawaz told CNN on Wednesday that refusing to directly address the Islamist ideology puts all Muslims at risk of being blamed for the actions of a tiny minority — the exact opposite effect of what Obama intended by his approach.
"When the president said there's a poisonous ideology that needs to be refuted by Muslim clerics, the average everyday non-Muslim, the only word they know for that is the religion of Islam and they will think that the ideology we are referring to is the faith of Islam itself and thereby they would end up blaming all Muslims," Nawaz said.
"Islam is a religion like any other with all the various sects and denominations. Islamism is a desire to impose Islam over society. And that is a very theocratic extremist desire. It can manifest itself violently. When it does, I call it jihadism. But it can also manifest itself politically. It's still a problematic ideology because any desire to impose anyone's faith over anyone else is inherently flawed and must be challenged," he said.
"Al Qaeda didn't inspire extremism. It was this extremist Islamist ideology that inspired al Qaeda. And unless and until we recognize the problem isn't these Mafiosi-style groups that we can just take out by taking out their leaderships, but it's the ideology that inspires them, we'll have a new [Islamic State] tomorrow."
Nawaz was among 23 Muslim reformers who signed a full-page ad in the Sunday New York Times on Jan. 11 asking "What can Muslims do to reclaim their 'beautiful religion'?"
"If Islam is a religion that stands for justice and peaceful coexistence, then the quest for an Islamic state cannot be justified as sanctioned by a just and merciful creator," the ad by the Gatestone Institute states. "It is the duty of us Muslims to actively and vigorously affirm and promote universal human rights, including gender equality and freedom of conscience."
But none of the 23 reformers who signed the ad were among those invited to the White House summit. One of them, Tarek Fatah, a columnist for the Toronto Sun in Canada, had earlier taken note of the lack of response from administration officials and journalists.
"Instead of engaging with these progressive Muslims and supporting their call for reform, not only did the White House ignore them, but every media outlet I saw other than Fox News did as well," he wrote on Feb. 3.
Instead, the White House and many in the mainstream media work with Muslim leaders who sympathize with the extremists, says Zuhdi Jasser, a doctor and former Navy officer who leads the American Islamic Foundation for Democracy.
"This is a Muslim problem that needs a Muslim solution," he told the Washington Examiner in November. "You can't just say it's about violence. You need sermons that call upon America as the leading force for goodness in the world."
Jasser's activism against Islamist theocracy recently landed him a prominent role in what the left-wing Center for American Progress calls the "Islamophobia network." In a report released Feb. 11, the group said Jasser "promotes conspiratorial claims that America is infiltrated by radical Muslims."
But many so-called mainstream Muslim groups that Jasser has criticized have documented extremist ties. Sympathies with the Muslim Brotherhood, an Egypt-based Islamist movement, landed two U.S. groups, the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Muslim American Society, on the list of terrorist organizations banned by the United Arab Emirates.
Though both groups vigorously deny extremist sympathies or ties, there is ample evidence that CAIR was founded by supporters of Hamas, the Brotherhood's Palestinian branch and a banned terrorist organization in the United States, and that the Muslim American Society is the Brotherhood's U.S. branch.
Is not the Quran, the Koran the Bible so-to-speak of Islam?
How can one pervert Islam more than the Quran, the Koran, whichever way you wish to address it?
A handful of muslim reporters does not constitute a reform movement among the 1.5 billion muslims infecting the planet.
A poll stated that 85% of muslims agreed that targeting civilians was just and good.
That’s more than 1.2 billion blood thirsty savages who have yet to acquire the necessary weaponry and opportunity to join in.
This article seems to be a poor attempt to support, to legitimize Obama’s remarks regarding terrorists perverting what Islam really is, but as I commented “a poor attempt”.
Bingo.
But all those apologists among our politicians don’t want to touch the Quran with a 10-foot pole or study it because then they will have to admit that today’s “extremism” is nothing but basic teachings of this unholy book.
Yes this is what most of us think. But it could be that in his messianic delusions he thinks he can bring peace w/even the most radical of Muzzies? All it needs is a little O mojo and poof, it’s done?
Very interesting.
Bammy already acts like the Caliph of America.
The ‘extremism’ Obama wants to fight is:
The right wing of the Republican party.
Uppity Christians
Cops
People who believe in the Constitution of the United States..
And members of the Tea Party.
WHAT? No link between Islam and Islamist groups?
Do the Obamists listen to themselves at all?
There’s no such thing as ‘reforming’ Islam. It must be wiped out from the face of the Erf.
I know the answer to this one!
Because Obama doesn’t think Islam needs reform.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.