You are not addressing my point but maybe other freepers points.
You attacked him instead of addressing what the article states. Now the article was there for you to read. The article is what we were talking about but for some reason you decided to do an Alinsky and attack he author of the article instead of addressing what the article has to say.
Why is that? Do you agree with the article or not?
Whoops, sorry, let's remedy that.
From the article:
“Somehow, I think there are plenty of people federal prosecutors have not gone after so aggressively for a similar offense.”
The author claims D’Souza was prosecuted because he criticized Obama.
The author bases that claim on the author's unverified belief that others have not been prosecuted for similar actions.
Why doesn't he tell me the names of some people who have not been prosecuted?
Is it because they don't exist?
From the article: “Dinesh Was Right – Obama Forming Global Caliphate”
D’Souza, as I recall, blames Obama’s Middle East policies on some latent psychological issues Obama has about his Father's anti-Colonialism and hatred of the West.
I disagree.
I think Obama is just a standard issue hard line Socialist.
He hates Israel, he hates Jews, and he hates America.