Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed prepares to usher F-16 through 12,000h service life
Flightglobal.com ^ | FEBRUARY 19, 2015 | Dan Parsons

Posted on 02/19/2015 6:36:51 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

The US Air Force has all but scrapped a plan to install advanced radars on its Lockheed Martin F-16 fighters, but Lockheed is pressing forward with plans to outfit other nations’ aircraft with the capability in hopes the US will eventually purchase the capability.

USAF officials scrapped a comprehensive upgrade effort for F-16 Block 40 and 50 aircraft called the combat avionics programmed extension suite (CAPES) in its current fiscal year budget but preserved money over five years to replace the aircraft mission and display computers.

“Those are the foundational systems that need to be installed to support an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar upgrade in the future,” Rod McLean, vice president of Lockheed’s F-16/F-22 integrated fighter group, tells Flightglobal.

CAPES was intended to be a joint programme between the USAF and Taiwan, which is now performing the upgrades unilaterally. The USAF has plans to keep the F-16 technologically relevant until the Lockheed F-35 came online beginning in 2016. Given a choice, air force officials chose to follow an incremental upgrade path rather than go all in on an AESA upgrade for the F-16 in the near term, McLean says.

“Even though the US Air Force pulled their involvement, there still is a baseline capability that we will install in the Tawain air force F-16s that will be applications to the US Air Force in the future,” he says.

Taiwan will become the launch customer for the F-16V configuration, which involves mission computer upgrades, structural reinforcements and the integration of an AESA radar, in this case the Northrop Grumman APG-83 scalable agile-beam radar (SABR).

“We are starting to see a number of customers beginning to line up behind that configuration,” McLean says. “We should hear some news by the end of the year for additional upgrade contracts to V configuration.”

The F-16 needs more than an avionics upgrade to fly for much longer than their originally intended 8,000h service life. Many nations that fly the aircraft, including the USAF, are considering pushing them to at least 10,000h if not 12,000h.

“It’s quite realisable that we can get up to 12,000hr on the airplanes,” McLean says. “The point is, they will continue to be the backbone of the US Air Force fleet for a number of years until the F-35 comes online. Already, they are the backbone of many international coalition partners’ fleets as they are heavily engaged in the fights around the globe.”

Lockheed is putting an F-16 through stress and fatigue testing in order to design a service life extension retrofit kit that would allow Block 40 and 50s to fly as many as 12,000h. That test programme should be complete in 2015.

The process involves putting the airframe through the equivalent stress of three 8,000h service lives. The test vehicle has already undergone 16,000h of tests, he says.

“As the test progressed, we saw some occurrences and made some repairs,” McLean says. “We updated our models to reflect that and then identify a kit, a set of parts and components or structure members that we’ll need to go off and procure and install on the airplane to take it to 10,000 or 12,000 hours.”

Initial assessments indicate “nothing significant” like wholesale bulkhead or wing replacement is needed to extend an F-16s service life, McLean says. Bulkhead repairs will be required, as was the case with a portion of the USAF’s two-seated F-16 fleet. A crack was found in the canopy sill longeron of several of those aircraft until Lockheed devised and implemented a permanent repair for those aircraft.

Lockheed is still building about 1 new F-16s per month at its Fort Worth, Texas, manufacturing facility on a line with orders that will sustain it through 2017, McLean says. He hopes to have orders for another new-build customer ‑ either a Middle East or South American nation – before the end of the year, the deadline to avoid costly production gaps.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aesa; f16; lawndart; lockheedmartin

1 posted on 02/19/2015 6:36:51 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

How many of these will Isis have when they conquer Iraq?


2 posted on 02/19/2015 6:42:29 PM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Tally-Ho


3 posted on 02/19/2015 6:44:57 PM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparky1776; militant2; TaMoDee; freedumb2003; PERKY2004; PilotDave

F-16 ping.


4 posted on 02/19/2015 6:47:26 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
We are entering the era, again, of "any 'ol airframe will do quite nicely, thank you"

The avionics...the combine suite...is really all you need to get into the fight.

5 posted on 02/19/2015 6:47:33 PM PST by Mariner (First the GOP must die. Everything else comes after that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

The Air Force is sending old F16’s to Tyndall AFB in Panama City where they are stripped down and equipped with remote control. They then have their tails painted dayglo orange with accompanying stripes on the fuselage and are flown out in the gulf where they are used for target practice for F22’s and F35’s.


6 posted on 02/19/2015 6:51:49 PM PST by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

What has that have to do with the Iraqi F-16’s?


7 posted on 02/19/2015 6:59:27 PM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

They will extend the life of the F-16 so long that my unborn grandchildren will be flying them. They are to capable and to affordable to put out to pasture. They will be flying in US service long after I’m dead and forgotten.


8 posted on 02/19/2015 7:06:58 PM PST by PilotDave (No, really, you just can't make this stuff up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We are led by idiots and traitors. Not’maintaining/upgrading what we currently have for the fewer already obsolete nonworking future fighters noboy is happy with.

I believe all this has been planned and made’to look like incompetence.


9 posted on 02/19/2015 7:11:52 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

F16s are on the way out as obsolete. One manufactured a month.
Big deal.


10 posted on 02/19/2015 7:26:51 PM PST by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

“One manufactured a month”
You discount the thousands in service?


11 posted on 02/19/2015 9:00:45 PM PST by PilotDave (No, really, you just can't make this stuff up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

“You discount the thousands in service”
Nope. They have provided an excellent platform. There is a reason why one rolls off the assembly line monthly. Technology advancment. Just as Pentium 1 computers became boat anchors. They are rapidly becoming outdated, but are also good for sale to foreign countries. And, apparently fit for target prctice for more advanced aircraft at Tyndall too.


12 posted on 02/20/2015 4:45:24 AM PST by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla
And, apparently fit for target prctice for more advanced aircraft at Tyndall too.

The QF-16s are old A models that cannot be upgraded to current standards, and are being used as target drones because we're running out of flyable QF-4s.

13 posted on 02/20/2015 6:03:49 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson