Thant being said, I can still not offer up an attaboy to Juan Williams, no more than I could offer up an attaboy for Obama if by some miracle, or stroke of luck, he got something right.
Perhaps it's my learned distrust of liberals and my getting used to wondering what their hidden agenda is that has caused them to say something I agree with. Perhaps his hidden agenda is to trash Hillary Clinton because he knows that the Clintons hate the Obamas. But since he was silent about Obama receiving foreign contributions, I contend that he is just playing politics. If you can disprove that by finding any reference of him uttering anything even remotely resembling a condemnation to Obama accepting foreign contributions, I will gladly admit my error. Until then, I still believe it is valid to question why Juan has not offered the same admonishment to Obama for his acceptance of foreign contributions.
While the narrow topic of the thread may have been Juan talking about the 2016 Presidential race, I see nothing wrong with expanding the topic to be foreign contributions to candidates and public officials. While it may not be on topic, if the topic is so very narrowly defined as to limit it to foreign contributions vis-a-vis the 2016 Presidential race. However, I still live in America, at least in name only, I will exercise my Constitutional right to free speech. So, while most American freedoms have been trashed I contend I should be able to expand the topic beyond just Juan's utterance regarding Clinton and the 2016 Presidential race, to the larger topic of foreign contributions accepted by existing public officials and candidates running for public office. Especially on a site I have come to believe honors our Constitution. Thus, I do not feel that it is off topic at all, but rather an expansion on the larger topic of foreign contributions to American politicos past, present, and future. A topic that Juan started even if he himself had limited it to only the 2016 Presidential race. Unfortunately not one of the talking heads present had the courage to ask Juan, for I would have loved to see his response.
Let me finish by responding to your question:
Delusional lying little child you are - you can not ever find a single word that I have written here or anyone else that says so - in fact, I've written much to the contrary - so you're either delusional or just a bald face liar. Which is it?
The short answer is neither. The long answer is I am just an American (unhyphenated and unqualified) who sees what is happening to this once great country, and is extremely concerned about its disintegration into a Third World hellhole.
I'm sure we agree on many things and share a lot of the same beliefs and convictions. This just wasn't one of them. LOL
P.S. I admire your gift to write book(s) that people actually want to read, and wish you continued success. I wish I had that ability, but alas have found that not to be something the good Lord chose to endow me with - as evidenced by my back & forth bantering with you. But I try my best, LOL.
Of course it was sincere offer. I am surprised, and humbled - and pleased - you are open to it. I apologize for my anger - I don’t take very well to being compared to Rove or any GOP estab figure - given the fact it’s the furthest thing from the truth.
ALSO: See FR Mail.
And yes, you and I agree on almost everything important - and our concern and fear for this country is exactly the same. The only tension is how to process a short moment of lucidity from a liberal with respects to saving this Republic.
You say disregard it because Juan is not one of the good guys - and he’s certainly not - but I say that when someone who is predisposed to disagree with us makes a good point, it actually has more power than when one of us say the same thing. That is it. Kind of like when a black conservative defends other conservatives against racism...Ben Carson, Herman Cain, Allen West - it simply carries more weight because of their skin color. It just does. Sad, but it does.
So when a Bill Clinton supporting liberal calls out the Clinton Foundation for being an illegal election slush fund - which it certainly is - that carries more weight than when I do (and I have for years). It just does. That’s the only disagreement between you and I. You clearly love the country and are in the fight to save it on the side of the white hats....as am I.
I guess I will give Juan this tiny kudo - because the Clinton Foundation has been a topic of interest and concern to me for a long time. For reference, look at this article I wrote about Fox News and Juan Williams five years ago:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2010/10/foxs_rash_juan_williams_overre.html
BTW, I took heat for that on this site....because i was being too mean to Juan. Ironic ain’t it?