Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FR_addict

I agree. Moore won that debate hands down.

Should a state follow an unconstitutional order from the Supreme Court?

No. It would be following an illegal order.

Our constitution gives the federal government no jurisdiction over marriage. There is no hint of same-sex marriage in over 225 years under this constitution in our nation’s history.

And they’re going to “find” it there in the last few years when Obama ran against it just 6 years ago???


2 posted on 02/12/2015 12:04:05 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
"There is no hint of same-sex marriage in over 225 years under this constitution in our nation’s history."

There is no hint of abortion either. It is time to ignore these justices at the federal level. They are nothing more than unelected tyrants that support liberalism.

5 posted on 02/12/2015 12:22:32 PM PST by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

But my commanding officer gave me an order to execute the prisoners!


17 posted on 02/12/2015 1:10:24 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Both homo marriage and obamacare have little popular support. Still, the detached DC elites force us to accept both.

These two issues illustrate why the states must reassert themselves, and do it constitutionally.

To accomplish this, it is way past time to repeal the 17th Amendment.

Article V.

32 posted on 02/12/2015 2:51:31 PM PST by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson