[C19fan]

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-12/ginsburg-says-u-s-ready-to-accept-ruling-approving-gay-marriage-i61z6gq2

[skeeter]

Rigid & decaying; Ginsberg is the perfect face of the left.

[a fool in paradise]

We are ready for this old turtle to retire. She won’t have to live in the world of her making.

[Farmer Dean]

Ruth never asked me if I was ready for this.
Another push,another provocation by the radical left.This will not end well for them.

[jimpick]

It does not matter what she thinks. It matters what the law states. But hey who needs laws when you can do what you want right you communist old hag?

[MaxMax]

Whore

[umgud]

Most gays probably want to win the right more than they actually want to be married. After this battle, they will next fight for the right to have sex with minors.

[circlecity]

From a legal standpoint what would it matter “if Americans are ready?” The unspoken assumption she appears to hold is that it is the job of the USSC to impose upon us whatever their personal views of morality are so long as they can get away with it.

[cdcdawg]

Then why don’t the American people vote for it? On what does she base this assertion?

[MarkRegal05]

Wow.. she sounds *exactly* like a spokeswoman for one of those homosexual rights organizations, with that whole “the homos are your sons, daughters, brothers, sisters” rhetoric.

Not very neutral of her to say these things while a case is pending, although I have zero faith that she’d recuse herself.

[MaxMax]

The SC wants to rule against the American people, and nullify our votes.
When this threshold is passed it could be applied to any vote for any person
such as deeming any liberal the winner of any election just based on their assumption
that America is ready for a Dictatorship country.

If this is passed there are no more boundaries in our Voting system,
and voting will be meaningless.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Eat your Jello and go back to sleep Ruthie.

[Texas Eagle]

Yeah. That's why every state where Americans have been asked to vote on the matter has voted no.

With as close as this fossil is to meeting her maker you'd think she'd be a little more circumspect in her pronouncements. Whatever circumspect means.

Maybe she doesn't know what happens to those who lead others astray. Hopefully there's someone who cares enough about her to tell her while she still has time to, oh, I don't know, repent.

[Adder]

Gee, don’t tip your hand on upcoming decisions or nothing like that...

Maybe you should recuse yourself, you dried-up husk.

It may surprise the good justice [spit] that homosexual marriage has only been passed in 12 states. It has been shoved down the peoples’ throats by black robed fascists such as her. Or per haps the better term is “shoved up the peoples’ azz”.

You leftist azzholes astound me.

[so_real]

There's no place in the Supreme Court for judicial activists.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Sounds like she already has her mind made up on the pending gay marriage case. In that case she should recuse herself from the case as she cannot be an unbiased juror.

[Petrosius]

If the American people are ready for it then let them implement, don’t impose it by court fiat.

[hlmencken3]

I intend on contacting Justice Ginsburg to ask her why the courts shouldn’t just leave the subject to legislatures if Americans are so ready.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contactus.aspx

I’m looking for her individual e-mail.

[Politicalkiddo]

Despite the fact that the voters have generally said “no”? Get lost, you old bat.

[Duckdog]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Thinks Americans Are Ready for Gay Marriage. Then she should have finished the statement with “with the threat of jail time or the point of a government gun.”