To: Olog-hai
As for the pice itself, he speaks a lot of truth about the situation in the Ukraine, but he himself puts his own credibility at risk notwithstanding. Yes, if you can get past the Bush-bashing and the swipe over the WMD issue, I think he makes some clear points. The thesis of his article is that there are two sides to this story and we're only hearing one of them.
3 posted on
02/10/2015 8:18:18 PM PST by
Drew68
To: Drew68
There’s often more than two sides to a story. In this case, to say that there are only two sides is to say that there is only Russia’s side and the European Union’s side.
6 posted on
02/10/2015 8:23:23 PM PST by
Olog-hai
To: Drew68
The thesis of his article is that there are two sides to this story and we're only hearing one of them.
Wow, that's a great point, Drew.
Similarly, all we ever heard in WWII was the Allied point of view, we never got to hear the Nazi side of the story. Same with "The Final Solution", we never got to hear the Nazi justifications for the genocide, just the Allied criticisms.
How did we ever survive such one-sided, biased reporting??
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson