Posted on 02/07/2015 8:48:48 AM PST by Dave346
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has conveyed messages to the Americans to the effect that “he didn’t know” the invitation extended to him to speak before the US Congress was anything but genuinely bipartisan, Israel’s Channel 10 news reported Friday night.
Netanyahu remains determined to go ahead with the address, to highlight the dangers of a deal that would leave Iran as a nuclear threshold state, but is making an effort “to soften” the Obama administration’s anger, and that of many Democrats, over the March 3 speech, the TV report said.
The report added that some 40 Democratic legislators are currently expected to stay away from the address, and that Netanyahu is anxious to avoid that spreading to a wider “second wave” of legislators.
Early Friday, a senior Israeli politician who is close to Netanyahu suggested that the prime minister had been misled into believing both Republicans and Democrats wanted him to speak, and that he had accepted the contentious invitation from House Speaker John Boehner because he understood the offer enjoyed bipartisan support.
Deputy Foreign Minister Tzachi Hanegbi (Likud) said Netanyahu “hoped and believed” the invitation was “bi-partisan, as the invite letter said — ‘a bi-partisan initiative’ — but because of the tensions between Congress and the [Obama] administration, [and] between Republicans and Democrats, a problem erupted.”
Speaking to 102 FM Tel Aviv Radio, Hanegbi, who is a close confidant of the PM, acknowledged that the row that has flared up between Israel and the Obama administration following the announcement that Netanyahu would speak to Congress about the Iranian nuclear threat presented a “dilemma.”
Boehner’s January 21 invitation to Netanyahu, indeed, stated: “It is my honor, on behalf of the bipartisan leadership of the US House of Representatives and the US Senate, to extend to you an invitation to appear before and address a joint meeting of Congress on Wednesday, February 11, 2015″ — the originally scheduled date.
The announcement infuriated the White House, which charged that the planned speech — subsequently moved to March 3 — breached protocol as it was not coordinated with the administration. The incident set off an ugly, ongoing public dispute between the Netanyahu government and the Obama administration, with senior US officials charging that the Israeli leader had “spat” in Obama’s face and could not be trusted.
There has been considerable vocal Democratic opposition, too, with Jewish House Democrats meeting privately with Israeli Ambassador to the US Ron Dermer to castigate him over the affair. At least three Democrats have said they will skip the speech, Vice President Joe Biden may not attend, and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said she hopes it will not go ahead.
Netanyahu has been an outspoken critic of the international efforts to negotiate a deal with Iran. He is set to warn strongly in his speech against a bad deal with Tehran. Initially, it had been suggested that he would also urge US lawmakers to pass a new sanctions bill against Tehran to force it to comply with international demands that it curb its nuclear program — a bill Obama strongly opposes and has vowed to veto because such a move would hinder the P5+1 negotiations under way to secure a deal. But officials in Jerusalem said last week that Netanyahu would focus less on sanctions and more on the dangers of a deal that allows Iran to become a threshold nuclear state.
“The dilemma is, how much can Israel insist and disagree and oppose this policy [of the international community seeking a deal with Iran] while simultaneously preserving our wonderful, intimate relationship with the US,” Hanegbi said, adding that “the question was if Netanyahu should pass up this unique opportunity, so necessary in terms of timing, before the deadline [for a deal between the P5+1 and Tehran].”
Hanegbi said Netanyahu was “investing a lot of effort in order to clarify to Democrats that this [planned address] is not an act of defiance against Obama,” and denied charges that the move was political, meant to boost Netanyahu’s image ahead of Israeli national elections set for March 17, two weeks after the speech.
Netanyahu indicated Thursday that he intended to go ahead with this speech, saying it was “my obligation as the prime minister of Israel to speak out against the danger of a nuclear agreement with Iran, and to do everything I can to prevent it.”
Obama is not only on the outs with Israel, but Merkel and Hollande are talking to Putin without bothering to invite our AssClown along. Are we becoming North Korea?
This has all been a calculated move by the Demagogic Party to humiliate our ally *yet again*. Anyone who saw their behavior at the convention in 2012 can't be surprised about this latest maneuver.
They won’t.
Is there any precedent for something like that?
What I meant was - I was thinking that there was a special gallery or something for visitors like that, and the regular seats were reserved for the legislators.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Wouldn’t it be interesting to guess which enemy islamists won’t be there?
Meanwhile, After snubbing Netanyahu, Biden meets with Israeli opposition leader Herzog in Munich. But that's not being partisan. No, not at all.
That sort of thing ... fortunately for Netanyahu ... plays to offset the “partisan issue” from the Israeli opposition. They cut the ground out from under themselves (and in their argument) by doing this.
So we should all kow-tow to, and check with, the dems, before breathing?
Just their point.
In their, and O'bumbles, delusional worlds, no one should make a move without first passing it through them and receiving their permission.
And you're okay with that?
Well, alrightly, then. (I thought WE won the Senate and the congress?)
Not to mention that, by the end of May, it may be too late to curb some disastrous actions = or non-actions on such things as Iran/ISIS. Some things are mor important than the dems time schedules and approval.
Yes, he should come and speak then too.
I corrected myself upthread. If he came two weeks later, at the end of March then there would be no issue. I don’t really care if Dems attend his speech or not, but may here are upset that some Dems are not going to attend. That’s why I suggested dong it on a day when there is not controversy.
Is there some way to get the Democraps to just absent Congress altogether? Perhaps Netanyahu should become House Speaker...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.