Posted on 02/06/2015 2:10:35 PM PST by lbryce
thanks for pointing that out, that was funnier than the joke.
You have absolutely no proof of this. I'd be surprised if even a tenth of this funding went to homosexuals.
Maybe Ruby wouldn't have taken her love to town if Viagra had been available a few decades ago.
I may have spent a similar amount. I am in my early sixties, divorced and dating. It’s been more fun than my last “wild oats “ period in my twenties.
However, erections lasting more than 4 hours are not as great as I might have imagined in my twenties.
LOL!
I believe when a soldier retires from the military, he can keep his Tricare Insurance, so older retired veterans should be able to get the medicine/items regarding erection problems just as regular insurance covers those needs. Medicare also pays an amount for those items. Some may not believe erectile dysfunction should be considered a medical problem, but it is. It is part of a functioning body and is important to men and their partners. That desire does not go away just because one gets older.
Excellent ??s although but a start.
If the Pentagon Spent $504,816 on Viagra Last Year, that means they’re looking for their balls.
Good grief! Friggin,’ deskjockeys..
Probably went to generals and admirals having problems standing at attention.
At $10.00 per pill and used once a week it comes out to about 1000 generals and admirals that got ED treatments on our dime.
I think in Brazil this crap is O-T-C.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.