Posted on 02/05/2015 8:00:19 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Obamas phraseology is an exercise in denial that Islam had anything to do with it. By referring to ISIS as this organization and using a clunky circumlocution like whatever ideology they are operating off of, he has made it clear he believes that Islam has nothing to do with terror. The cruel burning of the man was the action of a bankrupt whatever.
This of course is absurd. ISIS is Islam 101. Islam has a 14-century history of using terror to impose itself, starting with Muhammad, the creator of Islam. Usually it was just matter of cutting throats, lopping off heads, running people through with spears and swords, or shooting them with arrows. Islam is known as the religion of the sword, which was the weapon of choice. But even this particular mode of killing by fire has precedents in Muhammads behavior, his Sunna, and therefore it is allowable to the people of ISIS, who strictly model their behavior on Muhammads example.
Take for example the Dirar Mosque incident, a mosque in Medina Muhammad denounced as the mosque of dissidence and ordered it burned down. This occurred in A.D. 630 upon his return from the Tabuk raid at the head of 30,000 men who were disgruntled because nothing had been conquered so there was not any plunder to pay them with. The operation had targeted the Byzantines, but they were nowhere to be found. It is evident from the literature some of his people attempted to kill him on the return trip, and paranoid that dissatisfaction with him over lack of booty could get out of hand, he ordered the destruction of a recently built mosque as a warning to dissidents.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Why must I constantly clean up after those of you who have a blatant disregard for the rules? </tongue in cheek>
He’s just listening to the America-hating Jew-hating b!tch valerie jarret. $hithead does whatever she tells him to do.
Egypt court confirms Muslim Brotherhood death sentences
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3253263/posts
Lots of fools in the world...
There’s no evidence that Mohammad existed until almost 140 years after he supposedly died. The first reference to him is the “Life History of Muhammad,” by Ibn-Ishaq 768 AD. He was supposed to have died in 638 AD.
He may not have existed at all.
To win against ISIS, replace the crybaby reaction “they are horrible, let's take them to court” w/ “Let us just kill them all,no prisoners.”
https://twitter.com/nntaleb/status/562723457264529409
And the "Islamic State is not Islamic."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.