Right, the list of unproven reported side effects in less than 1 in 1 million doses. Like I said, that is what is called "statistically insignificant". In other words, the possibilities are so rare and remote that no serious person would bypass the benefits because of those statistically irrelevant risks.
One mans paper being Fraud doesn’t make it all the fact you claim in being safe.
On the contrary, the "one man's paper" is what caused people to believe in the fraud to begin with. Wakefield's claims have been proven false, and we now have the entirety of scientific evidence and research that shows there is no link, and never was. You might as well claim vaccines cause pregnancy, as there's equal evidence for both.
More study including a re-do on how the vaccines are dispensed needs to be studied and tested.
This has been done, and to do date there is ZERO evidence linking autism to vaccines. You are years behind on the current evidence.
Experiences tell me bad things can happen with vaccines and yes I’ve had a doctor stand there and tell me they don’t cause this type of reaction described in link. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3043874/posts?page=1