Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness
Townhall.com ^ | 12-4-2006 | Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr, MD

Posted on 01/24/2015 11:55:10 AM PST by DeweyCA

Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr.,a forensic psychiatrist, explains the madness of liberalism in his new book The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness. You can read an excerpt below, and read more at his website libertymind.com.

Like all other human beings, the modern liberal reveals his true character, including his madness, in what he values and devalues, in what he articulates with passion. Of special interest, however, are the many values about which the modern liberal mind is not passionate: his agenda does not insist that the individual is the ultimate economic, social and political unit; it does not idealize individual liberty and the structure of law and order essential to it; it does not defend the basic rights of property and contract; it does not aspire to ideals of authentic autonomy and mutuality; it does not preach an ethic of self-reliance and self-determination; it does not praise courage, forbearance or resilience; it does not celebrate the ethics of consent or the blessings of voluntary cooperation. It does not advocate moral rectitude or understand the critical role of morality in human relating. The liberal agenda does not comprehend an identity of competence, appreciate its importance, or analyze the developmental conditions and social institutions that promote its achievement. The liberal agenda does not understand or recognize personal sovereignty or impose strict limits on coercion by the state. It does not celebrate the genuine altruism of private charity. It does not learn history’s lessons on the evils of collectivism.

What the liberal mind is passionate about is a world filled with pity, sorrow, neediness, misfortune, poverty, suspicion, mistrust, anger, exploitation, discrimination, victimization, alienation and injustice. Those who occupy this world are “workers,” “minorities,” “the little guy,” “women,” and the “unemployed.” They are poor, weak, sick, wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised, exploited and victimized. They bear no responsibility for their problems. None of their agonies are attributable to faults or failings of their own: not to poor choices, bad habits, faulty judgment, wishful thinking, lack of ambition, low frustration tolerance, mental illness or defects in character. None of the victims’ plight is caused by failure to plan for the future or learn from experience. Instead, the “root causes” of all this pain lie in faulty social conditions: poverty, disease, war, ignorance, unemployment, racial prejudice, ethnic and gender discrimination, modern technology, capitalism, globalization and imperialism. In the radical liberal mind, this suffering is inflicted on the innocent by various predators and persecutors: “Big Business,” “Big Corporations,” “greedy capitalists,” U.S. Imperialists,” “the oppressors,” “the rich,” “the wealthy,” “the powerful” and “the selfish.”

The liberal cure for this endless malaise is a very large authoritarian government that regulates and manages society through a cradle to grave agenda of redistributive caretaking. It is a government everywhere doing everything for everyone. The liberal motto is “In Government We Trust.” To rescue the people from their troubled lives, the agenda recommends denial of personal responsibility, encourages self-pity and other-pity, fosters government dependency, promotes sexual indulgence, rationalizes violence, excuses financial obligation, justifies theft, ignores rudeness, prescribes complaining and blaming, denigrates marriage and the family, legalizes all abortion, defies religious and social tradition, declares inequality unjust, and rebels against the duties of citizenship. Through multiple entitlements to unearned goods, services and social status, the liberal politician promises to ensure everyone’s material welfare, provide for everyone’s healthcare, protect everyone’s self-esteem, correct everyone’s social and political disadvantage, educate every citizen, and eliminate all class distinctions. With liberal intellectuals sharing the glory, the liberal politician is the hero in this melodrama. He takes credit for providing his constituents with whatever they want or need even though he has not produced by his own effort any of the goods, services or status transferred to them but has instead taken them from others by force.

It should be apparent by now that these social policies and the passions that drive them contradict all that is rational in human relating, and they are therefore irrational in themselves. But the faulty conceptions that lie behind these passions cannot be viewed as mere cognitive slippage. The degree of modern liberalism’s irrationality far exceeds any misunderstanding that can be attributed to faulty fact gathering or logical error. Indeed, under careful scrutiny, liberalism’s distortions of the normal ability to reason can only be understood as the product of psychopathology. So extravagant are the patterns of thinking, emoting, behaving and relating that characterize the liberal mind that its relentless protests and demands become understandable only as disorders of the psyche. The modern liberal mind, its distorted perceptions and its destructive agenda are the product of disturbed personalities.

As is the case in all personality disturbance, defects of this type represent serious failures in development processes. The nature of these failures is detailed below. Among their consequences are the liberal mind’s relentless efforts to misrepresent human nature and to deny certain indispensable requirements for human relating. In his efforts to construct a grand collectivist utopia—to live what Jacques Barzun has called “the unconditioned life” in which “everybody should be safe and at ease in a hundred ways”—the radical liberal attempts to actualize in the real world an idealized fiction that will mitigate all hardship and heal all wounds. (Barzun 2000). He acts out this fiction, essentially a Marxist morality play, in various theaters of human relatedness, most often on the world’s economic, social and political stages. But the play repeatedly folds. Over the course of the Twentieth Century, the radical liberal’s attempts to create a brave new socialist world have invariably failed. At the dawn of the Twenty-first Century his attempts continue to fail in the stagnant economies, moral decay and social turmoil now widespread in Europe. An increasingly bankrupt welfare society is putting the U.S. on track for the same fate if liberalism is not cured there. Because the liberal agenda’s principles violate the rules of ordered liberty, his most determined efforts to realize its visionary fantasies must inevitably fall short. Yet, despite all the evidence against it, the modern liberal mind believes his agenda is good social science. It is, in fact, bad science fiction. He persists in this agenda despite its madness.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: leftism; liberalism; liberals; mentalhealth; progressivism
It is good to review this every so often to remind ourselves of what we are dealing with. Obama's narcissism is typical of Lib elites who think that they are god-like in their intellect and morality. They think that they can create a utopia (heaven on earth), and they will stop at nothing to try to attain it. It is their mission and purpose in life. It is their religion. They are their own god. Similar to what Satan thought of himself in Ezekiel 14.
1 posted on 01/24/2015 11:55:10 AM PST by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

One of the evils of collectivism being prejudice and racism...


2 posted on 01/24/2015 12:01:13 PM PST by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA; All

Lie to low-information voters, promising them constitutionally indefensible federal taxing and spending programs, and likewise indefensible civil rights protections, in order to win their votes.


3 posted on 01/24/2015 12:03:07 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA
his agenda does not insist that the individual is the ultimate economic, social and political unit; it does not idealize individual liberty and the structure of law and order essential to it; …it does not aspire to ideals of authentic autonomy and mutuality; it does not preach an ethic of self-reliance and self-determination

In a group of people who share common interests, I mentioned that I had experienced a "moment of feeling entirely alone." And that it felt wonderful to be on my own.

One of the men gasped and blurted out: "That's NOT NORMAL."

I countered, "That may not be average."

And he almost shouted, NO, that's not normal."

He has a psych degree. He has never been successful, because at the age of 70, he's still whining about terrible treatment at the hands of his father when he was three. OF course, he's all in favor of "hope and change," wants those "dreamers" to overrun us as fast as they can.

4 posted on 01/24/2015 12:11:47 PM PST by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA
Madness
5 posted on 01/24/2015 12:15:13 PM PST by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Veto!
"...…it does not aspire to ideals of authentic autonomy and mutuality; it does not preach an ethic of self-reliance and self-determination..."

And because conservatives ARE big on individuality and autonomy, that's precisely the reason conservatives have so much trouble electing conservatives...we're having trouble coalescing around viable candidates. My conservative is your "RINO".

And instead of grouping like libs do, we vote our own consciences and/or principles. And when our guy isn't THE candidate, a lot of us just stay home.

Libs, on the other hand, HAVE to group! They yearn and long for and need to be a part of something...an organization, a bureaucracy...something.

Seeking purity and perfection in our own, isolated echo chamber is sometimes killing us.

But hey, that's who we are.

6 posted on 01/24/2015 12:30:46 PM PST by Chasaway (Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Michael Savage, whom I never seem to find on the Internet any more, not that I have looked that hard, called liberalism “a mental disorder,” but the American people seem firmly in the liberal camp, whether “D” or GOP-e, forever.


7 posted on 01/24/2015 12:52:04 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

This is exhausting.

Liberals believe in a cause greater than self preservation which ultimately leads to their (and many other innocent folks) demise.

It is that simple.


8 posted on 01/24/2015 1:08:56 PM PST by Eddie01 (Liberals lie about everything all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Liberals are elitists who believe that it is their right to do what they believe is in the best interest of society (i.e., the collective). They do not believe in individual rights. To the extent they refer to rights, they do so only because they believe it beneficial to society (e.g., abortion). Ultimately, Liberals view the human race as a giant machine that only they are smart enough to run correctly. When things don’t work out as Liberals want (a common occurrence), they simply blame others for interfering. In every way Modern Liberalism is a religion (Marx is their God).


9 posted on 01/24/2015 1:09:02 PM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

I think that the mistake is believing the liberal cover story, that they represent a philosophy of leadership.

They do not. In fact they represent nothing, because representation involves caring about someone other than themselves, and refusing that very thing is the core of their lives.

Liberals are selfish to a degree an adult, by definition, cannot comprehend. They are stuck at the developmental stage of non- individuation. All they do is think of their wants. Liberal collective philosophy is simply what Leftists reward liberals for following.

Personally caring about issues is seen by liberals as supremely stupid, because to them obedience is the point the way of being allowed to stay selfish - not understanding.


10 posted on 01/24/2015 2:00:41 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chasaway
Seeking purity and perfection in our own, isolated echo chamber is sometimes killing us. But hey, that's who we are.

Purity and perfection are ideals, but I have no problem with flexibility when it means that the LIBTARDS are shut out. IMO, shutting out libtards is who we are. Progress, not perfection, is a reasonable goal.

11 posted on 01/24/2015 3:34:13 PM PST by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson