Posted on 01/23/2015 5:25:57 PM PST by SJackson
In his State of the Union address on Tuesday, US President Barack Obama painted a rosy picture of Americas condition at home and abroad, presenting a delusional list of his own accomplishments since taking office six years ago.
A careful dissection of each of his falsehoods which were nearly as numerous as the standing ovations he received from the Democrats in the room every time he punctuated a sentence could fill the pages of a lengthy book. But the abridged version is as follows: Everything would be even rosier if the Republicans were to stop opposing his policies, which not only have been making Americans healthier, wealthier and wiser, but have bridged gaps with countries all over the world.
One didnt know whether to laugh or cry while watching the lame duck remind us that he still has two more years of damage to inflict and veto powers to exercise.
Of most relevance to Israel, and to Americans who grasp the real and present danger of radical Islam, was the presidents position on the Islamic Republic of Iran.
To lead into it, Obama first took credit for stand[ing] united with people around the world whove been targeted by terrorists from a school in Pakistan to the streets of Paris. We will continue to hunt down terrorists and dismantle their networks, and we reserve the right to act unilaterally, as weve done relentlessly since I took office to take out terrorists who pose a direct threat to us and our allies.
Purposely omitting the religion and stated goals of these generic terrorists, he went on to assert that for the first time in a decade, weve halted the progress of [Iran's] nuclear program and reduced its stockpile of nuclear material, and assure Congress that he will veto any new sanctions bill that threatens to undo this [diplomatic] progress.
The giggles of glee from the mullahs in Tehran could be heard across the globe. You see, they have been speeding up their development of long-range missiles, while increasing their anti-Western rhetoric and openly threatening Israel with destruction. Oh, and serious retaliation for its having killed a Revolutionary Guard commander during an airstrike on Hezbollah honchos in Syria on Sunday.
Nor are Shiites the only Islamists emboldened by Obamas behavior. The Sunni radicals most notably ISIS (the Islamic State terrorist organization that has been committing mass atrocities against infidels the world over) are just as buoyed by a weak and supplicant White House.
Still, it is Iran that is on the brink of possessing nuclear weapons.
This is why Speaker of the House John Boehner extended an invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday to address Congress in early March. If anyone can spell out the Iranian threat and how it relates to and governs the terrorism that Obama claimed to be fighting it is Netanyahu.
The timing of the invitation, which Netanyahu promptly accepted, was eerily apt. On Wednesday morning, an Arab terrorist from the Palestinian Authority boarded a bus in Tel Aviv and stabbed more than a dozen people, wounding several critically.
Battling terrorism is nothing new to Israelis. But whenever there is an attack in the White City, it serves as a reminder that the bloodshed against Jews and Israelis really has nothing to do with the so-called occupation of lands won in the Six-Day War. The Palestinian leadership and media make no bones about their viewing the entire state of Israel as illegitimate and deserving of elimination.
Like their Islamist brethren across the Middle East, the Palestinians are players in a global jihad against Christians and Jews.
Obama doesnt see it that way. On the contrary, as he pointed out in his address, he considers the deplorable anti-Semitism that has resurfaced in certain parts of the world to be on a par with offensive stereotypes of Muslims.
He was thus far more angry about the breech of protocol made by Boehner and Netanyahu, for arranging a trip to Washington to warn about Iran, than about the terrorist attack in Tel Aviv.
And then came the real clincher: a Bloomberg new service report, according to which the head of the Mossad told a congressional delegation visiting Israel last week that he opposed new sanctions on Iran, on the grounds that this would be like throwing a grenade into the [diplomatic] process.
Though this did not sound the least bit plausible (and not merely because it goes against Netanyahus stance on the matter), it created a big media stir, which spurred an investigation into the allegation.
On Thursday, Mossad chief Tamir Pardo issued a statement denying the claim. It turns out that what he had said was, in fact, the opposite that sanctions have been effective, and that more sticks, not fewer, are needed in the carrot-and-stick approach with the Islamic republic.
Secretary of State John Kerry, however, was quick to use the misquote as proof that Netanyahus demand for tougher measures against Iran is both unreasonable runs counter to the assessments of Israels top espionage echelon.
Each new incident revealing the depths of animosity on the part of the Obama administration for Israel, coupled with its sidling up to the likes of Cuba, gives an energy boost to the enemies of Western democracy.
But Obama is more concerned with the weather.
No challenge no challenge poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change, he said, as Israelis in the Golan Heights and the Galilee prepared their bomb shelters for the next round of Iranian-sponsored rocket rain.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Completely true — but not news. Get ready for more disaster from the “White Mosque House” for the next year plus. What a total horrible mess.
And let’s not forget Kerry’s son in law is from Iran after all.
IMHO, if Iran gets the bomb, Obama will do NOTHING about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.