Posted on 01/14/2015 6:23:35 AM PST by SJackson
Democrats nominated Barack Obama in 2008 to extract America from George W. Bushs Iraq misadventure and to spread more fairly the proceeds of a quarter-century-old boom for which they credited Bill Clinton. The Election Eve collapse of Lehman Brothers changed things. It showed that there had been no boom at all, only a multitrillion-dollar real-estate debauch that Clintons and Bushs affordable-housing mandates had set in motion. It also showed how fast historians likely rankings of presidents can shift: Clinton went from above average to below average, Bush from low to rock bottom.
Obama may wind up the most consequential of the three baby-boom presidents. He expanded certain Bush policies Detroit bailouts, internet surveillance, drone strikes and cleaned up after others. We will not know for years whether Obamas big deficits risked a future depression to avoid a present one, or whether the respite he offered from humanitarian invasions made the country safer. Right now, both look like significant achievements. Yet there is a reason the presidents approval ratings have fallen, in much of the country, to Nixonian lows. Even his best-functioning policies have come at a steep price in damaged institutions, leaving the country less united, less democratic, and less free.
Health-care reform and gay marriage are often spoken of as the core of Obamas legacy. That is a mistake. Policies are not always legacies, even if they endure, and there is reason to believe these will not. The more people learn about Obamacare, the less they like it its popularity is still falling, to a record low of 37 percent in November. Thirty states have voted to ban gay marriage, and almost everywhere it survives by judicial diktat.
These are, however, typical Obama achievements. They are triumphs of tactics, not consensus-building. Obamacare involved quid pro quos (the Cornhusker Kickback, the Louisiana Purchase, etc.) that passed into Capitol Hill lore, accounting and parliamentary tricks to render the bill unfilibusterable, and a pure party-line vote in the Senate. You can call it normal politics, but Medicare did not pass that way. Gay marriage has meant Cultural Revolutionstyle bullying of dissenters (notoriously, Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty and the Mozilla founder Brendan Eich). You can call this normal politics, too, but the 1964 Civil Rights Act did not pass that way.
Obamas legacy is one of means, not ends. He has laid the groundwork for a political order less answerable to voters. His delay of the Obamacare employer mandate by fiat, his provision of working papers to immigrants by executive order these are not applications of old tricks but dangerous constitutional innovations. After last falls electoral rout, the president claimed to have heard (presumably to speak on behalf of) the two-thirds of people who didnt vote. And he has forged a partnership with the countrys rich not the high-earning professionals calumniated in populist oratory (including his own) but the really existing Silicon Valley and Wall Street plutocracy.
For a generation, there has been too much private wealth in politics; Obamas innovation has been to bring private wealth into government. He has (with others help, certainly) begun to emancipate the presidency from Congresss control of the budget. In 2013, JPMorgan Chase, Obamas most important early contributor, paid the Justice Department about $20 billion in fines (involving no high-level prosecutions), all of it redeployable by the administration. Federal stimulus funds incentivized states to approve Bill Gatess Common Core curriculum. Michael Bloombergs Young Mens Initiative, a private endeavor, has been adopted with modifications by the White House.
Under the nations first black president, race relations regressed. At times maladroit (insulting a police officer for arresting his friend Henry Louis Gates, unaware the cop was an expert on racial profiling), at times unlucky (calling anger over the non-indictment of Darren Wilson understandable as rioters torched Ferguson, Missouri, on split screen), at times ethnocentric (Eric Holders arguments on behalf of my people), the administration alienated sympathetic whites. Mitt Romney won three of five white votes in 2012, and exit polls from 2014 show this to be a floor rather than a ceiling. Obama may be remembered the way Republican California governor Pete Wilson was after he backed the anti-immigration Proposition 187 in 1994as one who benefited personally from ethnic polarization but cost his party and his country dearly by it.
Obamas reputation will also have something in common with that of the last Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, who believed history and technology have a direction and that his job was to align his country with it, no matter how illogical or undesirable it might appear to his countrymen. Like Gorbachev, Obama will be esteemed in certain quarters a generation from now, but probably more by foreigners than fellow citizens, and more by his countrys enemies than its friends.
Christopher Caldwell is a senior editor at The Weekly Standard.
*This article appears in the January 12, 2015 issue of New York Magazine.
Too bad it’s only a metaphor.
If the Presidents were to be judged by objective historians, I think GWB would rank somewhere above average, and Obama near the bottom (along with Carter and a couple of the mid-19th century Presidents).
Carter's one big accomplishment was the Camp David Accords, which may have marginally improved the situation in the Middle East but did nothing to resolve the overall Arab-Israeli conflict and was tangential to American welfare overall. Obama's major accomplishment, Obamacare, is causing and will continue to cause damage to the country, so Obama already deserves to rank below Carter, even before his last two years operating the wrecking ball. But academic historians will try to rank him higher.
History is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon. Napoleon Bonaparte (1769 - 1821)
Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past. George Orwell: 1984
Only if you allow it ...
Ten people who speak make more noise than ten thousand who are silent. Napoleon Bonaparte
Why it won’t, history is written by libtards who rank the likes of FDR and Truman as “great”.
Obama will be a “misunderstood and under-appreciated President who flirted with greatness”.
The Camp David Accords were extremely important in that they established a peace between Israel and Egypt, recent adversaries, which has held these many years. But Carter's role has been typically exaggerated. Both Israel and Egypt wanted peace, and Sadat had already flown to Israel to get it. In effect Carter simply added American guarantees to a deal the principals had already worked out.
All: you might look at the new 10th anniversary edition of “Patriot’s History of the United States” or T volume 2of “A Patriot’s History of the Modern World” for an accurate analysis of Zero’s first term.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.