Putin's Way [PBS documentary]

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/putins-way/ ^ | 13 Jan 15 | Unknown

[elhombrelibre]

Knock yourself out.

[logi_cal869]

Intellectual dishonesty: The best laxative...

[elhombrelibre]

You demonstrate again what I've written already about your posts. You're spending a lot of time crassly talking about bowel movements and your constipation without discussing issues associated with the original post. It's that important to you to ignore a man (Putin) who calls the USA and our allies the enemy. So be as sophomoric as you like. People who care about freedom and good government won't pay you any mind. Your inane and vulgar repartees reveal the level of your intellect and values better than a using Latin and discussing your bowels.

[logi_cal869]

Nice try. /s

Since reading comprehension is not your strength, I wrote:

By the way, there is NOTHING more offensive than what you wrote about me “opposing good government”. Use of Alinsky tactics is a ploy of progressives.

...just to be clear...

and

If you don't like being called on defending PBS for everything else they produced because you're so desperate to prop up your agenda that you would use a PBS production to do so, then don't use a biased source to defend your position. Admitting you were wrong and that you do, indeed, have an agenda would at least be 'honest'...

and

Can't make it any more clear than I did. You came out swinging with made up lies about me. If this is catharsis, fine. I still see no apology.

Not sure which one I'm replying to here, because it seems there are 2 or 3 of you, seeming each with a difficulty in reading ability and, between the 2 or 3 of you, a touch of intellectual dishonesty (all I'm referring to there is the latter above)...which is what is driving your effect on me...

[elhombrelibre]

I never defended everything PBS has shown. If you could read, you'd know that. In fact, the post was about one program. If you could read, you'd know that. And if you were not so much of the Alinsky you accuse me of being, you'd realize you cannot engage in childish name calling and then take umbrage when it's pointed out that you have your own hidden agenda. You don't want Putin exposed because you're trying to make a virtue of your cowardly approach to his aggression. You're either statements show you're an isolationist and probably a pacifist, except for your very frightening allusion to fisticuffs. LOL. You apparently were not in school when the lessons of the 1930’s were taught, and that's why you can shrink from those lessons back into your own intellectual dishonesty of pretending your insular world view is the model for a good nation. Otherwise, you can rant about whatever you like. You're fully exposed and have contributed nothing of merit to the post besides being a gadfly and a goofball.

[logi_cal869]

And now you’ve reverted back to Alinsky tactics and with more intellectual dishonesty. Is this the first of you or the 2nd (or 3rd)?

My last comment could not have been any more clear. Not only are you deficit in reading comprehension, intellectually-dishonest and...well...

I’m bored; your words (both of you) ‘speak for themselves’...

[elhombrelibre]

YOU should be bored. You’ve been creating straw men to argue with and showing yourself to be shallow.

[logi_cal869]

Is this the OP, his ghostwriter or mother?

I was right about the bar.

[logi_cal869]

Correction:

about ‘in person’.

[elhombrelibre]

You’re really weird.

[logi_cal869]

[elhombrelibre]

Hey, cool. You posted a selfie.