The loss of climate significance

americanthinker.com ^ | 1/9/2015 | Sierra Rayne

[rktman]

The NOAA National Climatic Data Center has released the complete 2014 dataset of state, regional, and national climate data. This allows us to look for which regions have statistically significant trends in annual temperatures over the past three decades – the period over which climate alarmists tell us that climate change impacts should be evident.

The results are not promising for the alarmists.

[rktman]

Yikes! Nah. The climate will always be significant, but there's not much we can do about it. Well except in the eyes of the true warmunists. Oddly enough, not much study is required to state that the climate has been in flux since day one and will continue to be in flux until gaia decides she/he is done with us pesky humans. :>}

[MrB]

Liberals become “environmentalists” because they don’t have anything real to worry about.

[DannyTN]

I hate it when we lose climate!

[rktman]

LOL! True dat. Losing the climate would create a few issues for sure. :>}

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

This Glo-Bull warming is getting to me! I had to go out and bust ice on the cattle tank this morning just like I have had to do for the last 58 years BEFORE glo-bull warming became a problem!

Ice is as thick today as it was back then!

[William Tell]

MrB said: Liberals become “environmentalists” because they don’t have anything real to worry about.

Actually, I think it may be the reverse.

That is, liberals become environmentalists because their lives are messed up and they need the distraction of a cause they can pursue without doing anything about their real problems.