Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge dismisses Christian Firefighters’ Lawsuit – Says They must participate in Sodomite Parade
Sons Of Liberty ^ | 1/1/2015 | Anan Coca

Posted on 01/05/2015 4:50:08 AM PST by HomerBohn

You may not remember this, because it all started way back in 2001, but an important test case just resolved itself up in Rhode Island.

Back in 2001, two Christian Firefighters were forced to participate in a sodomite parade that took place in Providence, Rhode Island. The two firemen asked for reassignment based on their religious beliefs and were promptly denied by their superiors. After some time and receiving legal advice, they decided to sue both the mayor and the fire chief of Providence.

The firefighters are both Roman Catholic, and as such, are opposed to the glorification of the homosexual lifestyle. They also argued that by taking part in the parade they were subjected to sexual harassment from parade-attendees as well as their co-workers.

However, the Judge in the case apparently disagreed. Because after more than 10 years of litigation, he has decided to dismiss their case.

Pick up Bradlee Dean's powerful testimony, illustrated by former DC Comics artist Danny Bulanadi, in the Sons of Liberty Store.

Justice William Robinson, writing for all five members of the high court this month, said the men appeared in the 2001 parade as public servants who were “relatively anonymous.” He called it a legitimate work assignment.

“The respondents’ appearance in the parade, solely as members of the Providence Fire Department, did not constitute a form of expression on their part. Rather, it was simply the accomplishing of a task assigned to an engine company of the Providence Fire Department,” Robinson wrote.

While taking part in a city-endorsed parade may be part of the tasks assigned to an engine company, it is unfathomable to believe that the city can force employees to operate contrary to their religious beliefs.

That the First Amendment to the Constitution does not hold precedent over a politically correct expression of sexual deviancy is a crime in and of itself!

The state cannot force Christians to accept as moral and right what the Bible and 4000 years of Judeo-Christian teaching have taught us is wrong. It would be perfectly reasonable, and easily adjudicated, for a Jewish fireman to refuse to participate in a Christmas parade. Or for a Muslim Fireman to beg off of a Bacon Festival Parade.

It should also be reasonable for those who are morally opposed to the celebration of homosexuality to ask not to be forced to participate in a Gay Parade.

What the judge in this case has done is set a precedent saying that government employees can be forced to participate in events that run counter to their morality and even their religion. Christians who happen to be employed by the government no longer have the right to cling to the First Amendment. Not only is this a miscarriage of justice, but it is also a blow to religious freedom for all Americans.

Source

Editor’s Note: This is an issue of conscience. As Peter and John openly declared when told not to preach in the name of Jesus of Nazareth:

“We ought to obey God rather than men.”

I hope these firefighters will remember that and inform the judge that they will not be following his “opinion,” but rather the commands of God.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: HomerBohn
“The respondents’ appearance in the parade, solely as members of the Providence Fire Department, did not constitute a form of expression on their part. Rather, it was simply the accomplishing of a task assigned to an engine company of the Providence Fire Department,” Robinson wrote.

I thought the purpose of a fire department was to respond to fires and other emergency situations - not to march in parades. Is there some type of charter or other official document that specifically identifies the scope and mission of the fire department? Can the fire fighter's union fight this on those grounds?

21 posted on 01/05/2015 8:04:56 AM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet

Another excellent point!

A fire chief who apparently has a thing for accommodating homosexuals and orders his firefighters to march in ‘their’ parade should be summarily dismissed.


22 posted on 01/05/2015 8:23:31 AM PST by HomerBohn ( I love the women's movement, especially walking behind it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Depending on their sense of security they should: (1) call in “sick”, (2) make a dental appointment for that day, or (3) tell the thugs in charge were to go and simply refuse to endorse perversion. My vote would be #3, but they may have obligations that infringe on their God-given freedoms and protected constitutional rights.


23 posted on 01/05/2015 11:11:47 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: offwhite
If you are, you're conceding that your employer was justified in asking you to violate your religious beliefs.

Quite untrue. All I'm doing is demonstrating that my religious beliefs are more important to me than my job. Has nothing whatsoever to do with any legal liability of my boss.

24 posted on 01/05/2015 11:53:19 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Individuals have a responsibility to do the right thing, too. Getting sick on gay pride parade day is a fine solution to this problem. Firemen and Police officers have sick leave.


25 posted on 01/05/2015 2:54:11 PM PST by SaraJohnson ( the)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Time to use a sick day?


26 posted on 01/06/2015 4:49:38 AM PST by rfreedom4u (Do you know who Barry Soetoro is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

It’s not considered a political stance anymore, since both parties support it.


27 posted on 01/06/2015 10:16:19 AM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Call in sick.


28 posted on 01/06/2015 10:39:03 AM PST by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson