Replies

I am not implying Romney was a good choice in 2012. However based on what Obama has done for 6 years, even a dog catcher would have been far better for the future of this country.

90 posted on 12/31/2014 8:31:54 AM PST by entropy12 (Dumb and Dumber to borrow money from China to protect oil flow to China from middle-east.)

Romney was a BAD choice in 2012, and he would have been BAD for America -- worse than Obama because good, patriotic Americans rejected Obama and can fight what they rejected. Romney would have been in office, wielding all his bad stuff and amoral tyranny, and folks who knew he was bad, would be responsible because they voted FOR him on the flawed, faulty rationale that he would be "better" than Obama! WRONG, entropy -- he was equally BAD as Obama in terms of damage wrought.

entropy, It is better to fight tyranny you rejected than tyranny you elected.

92 posted on 12/31/2014 10:28:33 AM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)