To: sten; alstewartfan
your ignorance was not their concern
their concern was to insure anyone assuming the office had no foreign allegiances, at least by birth.
Then why didn't they write down your opinion of what it means in the Constitution?
Why hasn't the US Congress and/or the Supreme Court put this issue to bed and rule in favor of the opinion you so confidently state as fact?
79 posted on
12/30/2014 7:02:19 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
the USSC has had opinions in which they stated a NBC requires two US citizen parents and being born on the soil. i posted a link that referenced the cases.
as for why the current USSC hasn’t dealt with the issue is that the cases ALL get dismissed before being heard. why? because they would require 0bama to submit his BC as evidence... an act that would result in him committing federal forgery.
80 posted on
12/30/2014 8:17:48 PM PST by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson