Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soledad Cross land transfer approved
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | 12 DEC 2014 | Kristina Davis

Posted on 12/13/2014 11:11:38 AM PST by South40

Law could let landmark stay through private ownership of property


Image by: South40

A law allowing the transfer of the plot of land beneath the Mount Soledad cross from government to private ownership sailed through Congress on Friday and was headed to President Barack Obama to sign.

But hope that the bill might put an end to the 25-year litigation surrounding the religious La Jolla symbol on public land is fraught with many yet unanswered questions, including details of the land deal and whether it would pass muster in the courts, especially considering previous efforts have failed.

The measure was tucked into the National Defense Authorization Bill, a massive $585 billion military spending bill passed by the House last week and by the Senate on Friday. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Alpine, introduced the measure.

It allows the 29-foot cross, which sits on a 14-foot veterans memorial displaying some 3,600 plaques, and the surrounding land to be acquired by the Mount Soledad Memorial Association. The private group built the cross in 1954 and has maintained the memorial since.

(Excerpt) Read more at utsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/13/2014 11:11:38 AM PST by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: South40

It’s a shame we live in a country where National Monuments have to be sold to a private concern to keep them from being destroyed.

It is almost as if the destruction is intentional.


2 posted on 12/13/2014 11:18:00 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

When is comes to religion, atheists are America’s Taliban, i.e. no religion but ours.


3 posted on 12/13/2014 11:21:07 AM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

Sorry, not all atheists, just the militant ones.


4 posted on 12/13/2014 11:22:32 AM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

Thank you. I’m an atheist, and I found the whole Soleded Cross controversy to be ridiculous. A cross on public land? So what!


5 posted on 12/13/2014 11:25:36 AM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
“When is comes to religion, atheists are America’s Taliban, i.e. no religion but ours.”

Atheists and Gays are in the same boat with me. Go do you own thing and I don't give a $hit! But a lot of both groups seem to get the idea that the way that they “legitimize” their perversions is to litigate issues like this ad nausium which only pi$$es the rest of us off.

6 posted on 12/13/2014 11:27:40 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

I find myself agreeing. When my fellow atheists start this kind of crap, I have this overwhelming urge to whomp them upside the head and tell them to get a life.


7 posted on 12/13/2014 11:31:33 AM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: South40

This sucks you could see this cross on freeway on 805 going into 5


8 posted on 12/13/2014 11:53:42 AM PST by SevenofNine (We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine
"This sucks you could see this cross on freeway on 805 going into 5

So?

9 posted on 12/13/2014 11:59:02 AM PST by BipolarBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: South40
Do those causing all the problems still have their teeth? If they still have their teeth why?

The doctrine of debate, discussion and the expression of different points of view all assume those creating the debate (like the idiot starting the legal objection)have something to say. They usually don't.

10 posted on 12/13/2014 11:59:09 AM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

Potatoes O’Brien


11 posted on 12/13/2014 1:14:13 PM PST by Lisbon1940
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

***The private group built the cross in 1954 and has maintained the memorial since.***

In what year was the first complaint? Anyone not liking it should have complained when it was built.


12 posted on 12/13/2014 4:03:08 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (I survived I-35W through Fort Worth in Rush hour! MILE AND MILES OF CONSTRUCTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson