Posted on 12/13/2014 9:00:21 AM PST by upchuck
While it would certainly be cathartic to flog the GOP for the lousy omnibus bill House Republicans just passed, it seems more productive to tackle a bigger issue. After a historic, yet unearned (Obama was the real GOP MVP) election victory, isnt it time for the Republican leadership to try to heal the rift with the base thats tearing the party apart?
Do Republican leaders REALLY want to spend the next two years of a presidential election cycle getting trashed the way they are right now by activists, Tea Party leaders and radio talk show hosts? Anyone who thinks the base is going to sit down and shut up or that the GOP can thrive over the long-term with this kind of intra-party feuding going on is kidding himself.
So realistically, heres what the Republican Party leaders need to do to help get everyone back on the same page.
1) They should never, ever, under any circumstances trash their base again. That means if the words "Tea Party, "Senate Conservatives Fund," "Mark Levin," Rush Limbaugh, Club for Growth, Heritage Action, etc., etc., come out of their mouths, then they better be saying something nice at best or neutral at worst. Additionally, staffers who mouth off about the base should be unceremoniously fired. At first, Republican politicians shouldnt expect to have that favor to be returned, but if youre a politician who wants unconditional love, go buy a dog.
2) The GOP has to keep its promises -- and quite frankly, more than a few Republicans seem to have a pre-YouTube era mentality about that. They think they can say anything they want on the campaign trail and then do something completely different in the office without people being any the wiser. For example, after the NRSC backed Charlie Crist over Marco Rubio, I fought it tooth-and-nail over that decision. After he won, Marco Rubio was one of my favorite politicians, but the moment he lied to us by breaking his campaign pledge to fight amnesty, he was dead to me. I will NEVER forgive Rubio for his dishonorable behavior, no matter what he does. Dont lie through your teeth to people who took you at your word and then expect us to be stupid enough to trust you again.
3) It's fine for the Republican Party to recruit candidates, but it should ALMOST NEVER be involved in primaries. If you want to know what an exception looks like, Ronald Reagan and George Bush, Sr. were right to endorse the guy running against David Duke back in 1989. Everybody has a role to play and an organization that is supposed to represent all Republicans absolutely should not be involved in a race between two Republicans. It creates an ocean of bad blood so big that there arent enough towels in Texas to clean it up.
4) The GOP leaders need to open up some lines of communication and if they have good motives, explain what they're trying to do and the strategy they're using with talk radio hosts, big websites, activist groups, etc. Locking influential conservative groups out of discussions of what the GOP should be doing BEGS for them to make trouble because its the only way they can get their opinion heard.
4A) A few years back, Republicans in leadership did reach out a bit and while it may have helped a little, it ultimately wasnt very effective because they looked at it as a way to try to sell what they were doing instead of having a conversation about shared goals. A lot of people, myself included, suspect the reason this isn't done is because we don't have the same aims on a lot of major legislation any more. I don't think the GOP leaders have any intention of seriously trying to stop Obamas executive amnesty. I don't believe they're committed to the repeal of Obamacare. I was even forced to agree with NANCY PELOSI and ELIZABETH WARREN (vomit) about the GOPs omnibus bill decision to make it easier for big banks to gamble with derivatives and the sleazy campaign finance reform that was designed to undercut activist groups. Would the GOP leadership really want to explain something like that beforehand? Ultimately, it wouldnt be that hard to get grassroots leaders to line up behind smart strategies to achieve conservative policy goals, but its an open question whether the GOPs leadership believes in the Republican Partys own platform enough to fight for it anymore.
5) Speaking of fights, the GOP leaders need to prove they're willing to fight and WIN on something that really matters to conservatives. At this point, the expectation of the Democrats, the mainstream media and even the GOP base is that the Republican Party is going to cave in every time. At some point, Republicans have to prove they can go head-to-head with the Democrats and win on something that matters. Of course, congressional aides could probably name 10 things that people don't care about that much where theyd claim to have "fought and won," but thats like a football team thats behind 70-0 complaining it isnt being given enough credit for all the 1st downs its gotten in the game.
6) People feel so burned by Boehner and McConnell that it would take AN INCREDIBLE amount of work for them to ever be trusted again. If someone like Jeb Hensarling took over in the House or John Thune took over in the Senate, hed immediately get a much longer leash from the base because hed be given the benefit of the doubt while people evaluated his performance. On the other hand, when it comes to Boehner and McConnell, symbolic gestures aren't going to cut it because were at a Cold War level of trust. It doesnt matter how much Castro tells you he loves democracy and freedom; youll believe it AFTER Cuba has a free election.
Last but not least, there's toxic residue in this area that goes all the way back to the end of Bushs first term that has never been addressed by the GOP leadership in an effective manner. There are a lot of conservatives who feel like they've been SCREAMING at the GOP for a decade and haven't been respected or heard. As long as the GOP leadership insists on maintaining a system where the only way conservative activists can make an impact is by raining hell down on the GOP leaders, they better keep a lot of ice water handy because thats exactly what theyre going to continue to get.
Not sure how old you are, but I lived though the Carter years when the future looked pretty dreary and grim...
Granted these times are different in many ways, but the vast majority of Americans still have the spirit of exceptionalism in their blood and soul...
We just need to leadership to give us a vision of the "shining city on the hill" again...
God willing they will rise again...
just keep doing what you’re doing. It’s working so well.
My sides are aching laughing so hard. I got news for you The DEMS have been ruling for a very long time except the two years Newt was allowed to be Speaker before the likes of John Boehner masterminded a plot to remove him. Look it up. Most Republicans are clueless as to the depths Boehner will go for the DEMs. Now who do you suppose gave Boehner that idea?
The GOP is full of DEMs. My two Tennessee GOP Senators are DEMs -R. Oh and for the added extra bonus the Bush's the beloved Saints of GOP-E now have an adopted brother. Can you guess his name and party? GOP Rule my Eye.. Spit!!!!
IMP support also means vote. My GOP Congressman Chuck Fleischmann has lost my vote for good as of Thursday night. My two Stooges RINODEM Senators never had my vote not even for Lamar Alexander's first term. I knew better.
Since January 1989 I have watched all elected POTUS & Both Houses from then till now Whiz away our rights, freedoms, money, and our kids futures to appease an Oligarchy of Evil under the fraudulent vessel of Trade. An Elite group of thugs who make Carnegie, Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, and Morgan back in their day look like saints. It has to be a Constitution vs Oligarchy.
I have Zero in common with the likes of Da Bushs, Clintons, Alexander, Corker, Romney, Christie, McCain, Perry {for the most part}, Huckleberry, Obama, Gore, McConnell, Boehner, Graham, Reid, Pelosi, etc and the list is many.
Unless someone running for office is willing to uphold and defend the Constitution of The United States so help them GOD they are my political enemy and an enemy to my nation. I will not enable any more tyrants with my vote. I don't give a Tinker D what party they claim to be in.
We don't need to form a third party. That is a recipe for disaster. We need to take back OUR party and kick the RHINOs to the curb.
I was Ten years old when Harry Truman was re-elected.
In light of what happened in Mississippi, just how do we do that? Removing the “turds” is not going to happen. The republican party is over; we need to have the courage to face it.
And by the way, perhaps you are not old enough to remember the first time Perot ran before he got goofy. He had an excellent chance of being elected and likely would have. The polls were showing 1/3 of the electorate for each of the 3 candidates. Then Perot dropped out and of course lost most of his support. He then came back but only 10% of his original support came back to him. I do think Perot was only in the race to get Clinton elected, hence his behavior.
But I do think that a plainspoken conservative, unafraid of the press and unconcerned with political correctness, who is serious about winning and not going to drop out if he finds himself ahead in the polls and likely to win, will indeed win.
Plus, a strong third party conservative candidate who pills so much support away from the liberal RINO that the democrat wins, will send a message to the GOPe whores that cannot be ignored. Either they embrace and represent their base, or they lose.
When in the history of this country, before now, has the the largest voter bloc ever knowingly chosen as their party leaders and representatives people who are blatantly dishonest and whose core beliefs (if they have any) are so utterly opposed to those people whose votes they expect to keep them in office, and told they most go along with this or else! You can go along with this if you chose, but I, in my senior years, am utterly fed up with it. I will never again cast my vote for a candidate who is unworthy of his office and unworthy of the people. I will either vote 3rd party or write in the name of a person who I admire and respect.
You might be interested in this thread.
I think so; the 2012 Libertarian candidate [Gary Johnson] was far better than either Romney and Obama.
Sounds good to me.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.