Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: South Dakota; re_nortex
Cruz is not eligible.
He is not a natural born citizen.
I don’t care who says he is


Please provide the relevant sections of the U.S. Constitution that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

Lacking that, Please provide the relevant sections of U.S. Federal Law that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

Lacking that, Please provide the relevant rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

You won't because you can't because they don't exist anywhere except in your mind and in sources that are not legal or constitutional in nature.
21 posted on 12/11/2014 6:37:40 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie; Jim Robinson; South Dakota
I've cited Jim Robinson as an authority on the subject of Senator Ted Cruz's eligibility. Although that's more than sufficient for any thinking person, Constitutional Scholar Mark Levin explains that Cruz is a natural born citizen. He does so logically and rationally with precision. That ought to end any further discussion on the matter.
31 posted on 12/11/2014 6:44:31 PM PST by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson