Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Approves Production of F/A-18 Infrared Tracking Pod
AIN online ^ | December 10, 2014 | Bill Carey

Posted on 12/10/2014 7:24:33 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

The U.S. Navy received Milestone C acquisition approval earlier this month to begin low-rate initial production (LRIP) of an infrared search and track (IRST) sensor pod for the F/A-18 Super Hornet. Manufacturer Lockheed Martin and partner Boeing will deliver six pods in the first LRIP lot.

The AN/ASG-34 IRST sensor gives the F/A-18E/F a long-range, passive search and tracking capability against multiple targets, supplementing the jet’s APG-79 active electronically scanned radar and other sensors. The pod is mounted on the nose section of the Super Hornet’s centerline fuel tank. It completed a first flight aboard an F/A-18F in February.

“Integrating the infrared pod onto the Super Hornet revolutionizes how we fight on a networked battlefield,” said Capt. Frank Morley, Naval Air Systems Command PMA-265 program manager. “IRST advances the Super Hornet’s role in air-to-air combat operations, keeping us ahead of our adversaries in an evolving threat environment.”

The IRST program “was not impervious” to defense budget cuts, said Michele Moran, the PMA-265 electro-optics/infrared integrated product team lead. “Our team was able to completely restructure the program, overcome the budget constraints and press forward with Milestone C.”

Vice Adm. Paul Grosklags, principal military deputy to the assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition made the Milestone C approval on December 2. The six LRIP pods will enable the program to work toward initial operational capability of the system, which the Navy expects in 2017.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; irst; superhornet; usn

1 posted on 12/10/2014 7:24:34 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; ...

Active Duty ping.


2 posted on 12/10/2014 7:30:26 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (Resist in place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Now the pilot can’t eject the center line fuel tank when it is empty?


3 posted on 12/10/2014 7:31:09 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 ((VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Obama will give orders for all center tanks to be dropped when empty. How else are the Ruskies, Chinese and Iranians going to get long-range passive detection technology?


4 posted on 12/10/2014 8:11:45 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Be nice if this could be integrated into the airframe as the Russians did with the Su-27 and maybe others? No doubt the room is just not there.

What difference in range vs. the Russian IR stuff would be interesting.

5 posted on 12/10/2014 8:24:00 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

~Obama will give orders for all center tanks to be dropped when empty. How else are the Ruskies, Chinese and Iranians going to get long-range passive detection technology?~

IRST technology might be new for F-18 but it is quite common on Flankers, which puts real combat effectiveness of radar-evading stealth aircraft in question.


6 posted on 12/10/2014 8:24:52 PM PST by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Or when the pilot needs to engage in air combat maneuvering????


7 posted on 12/10/2014 8:34:03 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232
Now the pilot can’t eject the center line fuel tank when it is empty?

Of course he can.

He just swipes his credit card using the conveniently located cockpit reader. His account will be charged $18,000,000 and - once authorization is received - he can release the tank.

8 posted on 12/10/2014 8:44:28 PM PST by Steely Tom (Thank you for self-censoring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
There is room; I guess the USN doesn't want to spend time and money to integrate it directly to the airframe of serving aircraft.
9 posted on 12/10/2014 9:05:03 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
There is room; I guess the USN doesn't want to spend time and money to integrate it directly to the airframe of serving aircraft.
10 posted on 12/10/2014 9:05:04 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Oh, he can drop the tank, he’s just going to have some ‘spanin to do. Hey, he will get a nice greeting/thank you card from Lockheed.


11 posted on 12/10/2014 9:06:21 PM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
No doubt the room is just not there

That problem will be resolved with version-2. The pilot will be removed to make room for the integrated pod and the plane will be piloted remotely from the Harry Reid memorial drone center in Nevada.

12 posted on 12/10/2014 9:53:19 PM PST by shove_it (long ago Orwell and Rand warned us of Obama's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“There is room; I guess the USN doesn’t want to spend time and money to integrate it directly to the airframe of serving aircraft.”

I suspect if they tried it, the NAVAIR required documentation would exceed the cost of the physical integration..........


13 posted on 12/10/2014 9:58:05 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

military ping


14 posted on 12/11/2014 12:29:19 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

*


15 posted on 12/11/2014 3:44:28 AM PST by skinkinthegrass ("Bathhouse" E'Bola/0'Boehmer/0'McConnell; all STINK and their best friends are flies. d8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232
Just what I was thinking. Why not incorporate it into the airframe? Yes there's a slight aero drag penalty, but with all the rest of the stuff hanging out in the slipstream, it would be negligible since all the electronics, except for the sensor head, would be internal to the aircraft.

Yes, it's a more expensive option and requires airframe modifications to retrofit, but if I got in a dog fight, It'd be the first thing to go!

16 posted on 12/11/2014 5:23:48 AM PST by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

IIRC, the F14 had its IR system integrated into the airframe, and it had longer range than the radar for detection and tracking. By now, these should be very mature systems.


17 posted on 12/11/2014 5:29:28 AM PST by wrench (Ebola is not a threat to the US. 0bama says so, and he would never lie..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson