To: wagglebee
Yes, but the choice we had was better than what we’ve got.
To: Roman_War_Criminal; Morgana; Responsibility2nd; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; Coleus; narses; ...
Yes, but the choice we had was better than what we’ve got. No, it wasn't.
There is no difference between Romney and Obama.
I realize that you're new here, but this is a CONSERVATIVE forum, not a GOP fan club.
13 posted on
12/09/2014 7:37:37 AM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Yes, but the choice we had was better than what we’ve got.
You are in agreement with the elite leadership of the Republican Party. Perhaps we will have a chance to vote for Romney again in 2016 or 2020.
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Yes, but the choice we had was better than what we’ve got.
Not by much.
Read my tagline.
38 posted on
12/09/2014 8:45:35 AM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Your assertion is a delicate issue here where theory and principle are seemingly at odds with each other.
Welcome to FR.
120 posted on
12/09/2014 3:06:04 PM PST by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson