Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

ICR article image

1 posted on 12/08/2014 5:02:16 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fishtank

http://www.psjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1666/13-059


2 posted on 12/08/2014 5:03:02 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Yeah because no one ever had more than one interpretation of the bible. Sheeesh!


3 posted on 12/08/2014 5:03:46 AM PST by muir_redwoods ("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

References

(1) Jones, W.T. et al. 2014. The first Paleozoic stenopodidean from the Huntley Mountain Formation (Devonian-Carboniferous) north-central Pennsylvania. Journal of Paleontology. 88(6): 1251-1256.

(2) While this age-dating method seems reasonable on the surface, this new fossil highlights why it presents an irony at best and a completely fallacious procedure at worst. The procedure falls under the term “biostratigraphy,” and first assumes that a certain animal lived and died within a specific time range often millions of years ago. It then assumes that every occurrence of that animal’s fossil marks that same moment in ancient time. But if that animal lived long before or long after its supposed time range—even though known fossils don’t yet show it—then it should not be used for dating. Similarly, until this find, a Stenopodidea fossil might have identified Cretaceous strata, but since these researchers describe Stenopodidea from a Devonian source, and since they still live today, they should not be used to identify time in rocks.

(3) Sherwin, F. 2010. The Strange Metaphysical World of Evolution. Acts & Facts. 39 (12): 16.

(4) As though to confirm the lack of an evolutionary history for these creatures, and thus unwittingly corroborate the concept that they were instead created, the Atlas of Crustacean Larvae recently wrote, “Stenopodideans have long been a source of interest and curiosity among decapod workers, as their relationship to other decapods is unclear,” partly because their larvae develop into adults in unique ways. Goy, J.W. 2014. “Stenopodidea.” In Martin, J.W., J. Olesen, and J.T. Hoeg, Eds. Atlas of Crustacean Larvae. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 245.

Image credit: Richard Ling. Adapted for use in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holders.

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Article posted on December 4, 2014.


4 posted on 12/08/2014 5:04:19 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

The outright contempt of the GOPe for the Biblical worldview, and the cowardice of far too many Republican politicians to openly espouse the Biblical worldview is unfortunate.


5 posted on 12/08/2014 6:04:28 AM PST by Menthops (If you are reading this..... the GOPe hates you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson