To: Bettyprob
Probing? Am I supposed to believe a dog beat SEALS?
To: Roman_War_Criminal
They must be the only SWAT team that won’t shoot a dog.
3 posted on
12/07/2014 4:04:46 AM PST by
glorgau
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Old school beats motion detector technology and costs less..
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Wait! I thought Muslims didn’t own dogs.. unclean or something...
5 posted on
12/07/2014 4:14:16 AM PST by
ArtDodger
To: Roman_War_Criminal
What this exposes is the lack of available HUMINT: They should have known there were dogs and been prepared to mitigate the threat. Using dogs for patrols/tripwire is a new tactic, ya know. (big SARC)
Relying solely on sensor-based intel results in this sort of failure. That ‘dog bark’ could very well have resulted in SEALS being taken hostage.
6 posted on
12/07/2014 4:21:31 AM PST by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus-)
To: Roman_War_Criminal
I thought muslims didn’t like dogs.
To: Roman_War_Criminal
ABC news last night said one of the guards went outside “to relieve himself” and spotted the SEALS.
25 posted on
12/07/2014 6:38:01 AM PST by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(Amnesty is Obama's Way of Saying "FU" to all those who voted on November 4th)
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Probing? Am I supposed to believe a dog beat SEALS?
Yes. If you do not stay downwind; and movement to fool a good dog is so slow as to be useless to an operation like this, you're going to be sensed by the dog long before you know where it's at.
Add to that, you have 40 people moving and not just one. The dog is going to be aware of you out to 100 meters.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson