Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan
By FR definition everyone in the primary besides Ted Cruz will be labeled a RINO, so Romney will have plenty of other candidates to water down his support ...

... at least according to the purists at FR.

5 posted on 12/04/2014 1:19:15 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: who_would_fardels_bear

When Ted Cruz, Jeff Sessions and Trey Gowdy lead the militia to the White House and put the Pres_ent in handcuffs, I’ll have my faith restored in the GOP. Until then, I ain’t voting GOP. Period. There may be folk out there who enjoy the experience of getting bent over and screwed, but not me.


8 posted on 12/04/2014 1:21:20 PM PST by dware (3 prohibited topics in mixed company: politics, religion and operating systems...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Precisely....the more RINOs who run the better....

If conservatives want to win they need to coalesce behind one candidate like they did in 1964 and 1980.


9 posted on 12/04/2014 1:21:40 PM PST by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

” By FR definition everyone in the primary besides Ted Cruz will be labeled a RINO,”

Nope, not Walker..............................the rest are : )

” at least according to the purists at FR. “

LOL


15 posted on 12/04/2014 1:25:32 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

The more RINO’s the better. That, and Elizabeth Warren, and we will be Cruz-ing to the presidency in 2016.


16 posted on 12/04/2014 1:25:41 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
By FR definition everyone in the primary besides Ted Cruz will be labeled a RINO, so Romney will have plenty of other candidates to water down his support ... ... at least according to the purists at FR.

My only question for Willard is which Mitt will run this time?

Mitt The Mass. Democrat
Mitt the Mass. RINO
Mitt the Conservative Primary Winner in 12
Mitt the RINO in the national election of 12?

24 posted on 12/04/2014 1:29:12 PM PST by VRWCarea51 (The original 1998 version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Is your IP address the same as that of The Post Turtle?


33 posted on 12/04/2014 1:37:37 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Team Romney: Severely Conservative ®

and the best friend of illegal aliens since Barack Obama.

Now tell us all about those annoying FR purists once again from your GOPe perch.


42 posted on 12/04/2014 1:45:32 PM PST by Pelham (No deportation = Defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
...the purists at FR.

You say that like it's a bad thing.

53 posted on 12/04/2014 1:50:21 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
at least according to the purists at FR.

LOL!

Romney wasn't impure, he was a pro-abortion, pro-amnesty, gun-control, socialized medicine, big government liberal.

That ain't impure, it's downright liberal, and doesn't match the republican party platform at all.

/johnny

56 posted on 12/04/2014 1:52:35 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: who_would_fardels_bear; C19fan; Jim Robinson; All
... at least according to the purists at FR.

I see that you've been here since 1999, fardels. I've only been here since 2002. Funny ... in all those 12 years I have never once come across a purist on FR. Not a single, solitary one!

I have, however, come across hundreds of FReepers who angrily accuse others of being purists.

In reality, any FReeper who accuses another of being a purist is blatantly insulting that individual because only an idiot thinks there's such a thing as a perfect candidate, therefore accusing someone of being a "purist" is exactly akin to calling that someone an idiot.

So why don't you list all the idiots ... er, excuse me, "purists" you mean to insult, fardels? I haven't seen a single one -- point one out to me, please?

*sigh* No wonder they call it the "stupid party."

103 posted on 12/05/2014 9:46:32 AM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson