Posted on 11/26/2014 5:17:32 PM PST by Swordmaker
The Justice Department is turning to a 225-year-old law to tackle a very modern problem: password-protected cellphones.
Prosecutors last month persuaded a federal magistrate in Manhattan to order an unnamed phone maker to provide reasonable technical assistance to unlock a password-protected phone that could contain evidence in a credit-card-fraud case, according to court filings. The court had approved a search warrant for the phone three weeks earlier. The phone maker, its operating system and why the government has not been able to unlock it remain under seal.
The little-noticed case could offer hints for the governments strategy to counter new encryption features from Apple Inc. and Google Inc., say privacy advocates and people familiar with such cases say.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...
Generally speaking, using encryption on public nets makes you suspicious.
Best to speak privately and face to face.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
01001010 01101111 01101000 01101110 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110011 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101100 01101111 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101101 01101111 01110101 01110011 01110100 01100001 01100011 01101000 01100101 00101110
If it was a terrorist case, I’ll bet the CIA could manage to get the password....don’t want to tell us? We have ways....
That’s not years...that’s more time than has elapsed sin the beginning of the universe. Even if you could try a billion passwords a second , that’s only a couple quadrillion a year.
Nothing electronic is safe. Period!!
2537B437103430B9
No twos compliments?
As above so below...
ineXORable
01010100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100011 01101000 01100001 01101001 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 01100111 01100001 01101001 01101110 01110011 01110100 00101110 00101110 00101110 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101101 01101001 01101110 01100100 00101110 00001010 01000100 01101111 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01110000 01110101 01110100 00100000 01101001 01101110 01100110 01101111 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01110000 01101000 01101111 01101110 01100101 00101110
Combine it (2 A) and they’ll be using the phone as a brick for at least 2 millenia. ..
01000001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100010 01100001 01110011 01100101 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100010 01100101 01101100 01101111 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110101 01110011 00101110
BTW I am so eager to see the new Benedict Cumberbatch film, “The Imitation Game”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5CjKEFb-sM
It depends on the complexity of the chosen passcode. Apple allows 256 character in the passcode and the characters can be any of the 227 the user can access normally through the keyboard. The only limitation Apple places is that the user may not repeat the same character twice consecutively, for example, XOX is OK, but XXO would not be allowed. Simple numeric passcodes can be only four digits. . . Stupid to use, of course. . . of which there are only 9,999 total combinations, that could be broken before I finished typing the word "broken." But a really complex pass phrase would take as long as you say.
Unfortunately for you, I was able to decode your secret binary message.
It decodes to: My hovercraft is full of eels.
Better luck next time.
01001001 01110011 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01001010 01101111 01101000 01101110 00100000 01010111 01101001 01101100 01101011 01100101 01110011 00100000 01000010 01101111 01101111 01110100 01101000 00111111
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.