Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Grab U.N. Arms Treaty To Take Effect Dec. 24
Investor's Business Daily ^ | November 13, 2014 | IBD EDITORIALS

Posted on 11/13/2014 10:12:32 AM PST by raptor22

Gun Control: To some, concern over a U.N. Arms Trade Treaty set to take effect Dec. 24 is much ado about nothing. But a president unconstrained by Congress or the Constitution may try to impose severe limits on gun rights.

All treaties must be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate, and that's not about to happen in the case of the unratified Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), particularly after the 2014 election that gave the GOP Senate control.

The same, of course, could have been said about the Kyoto Protocol and other climate change deals that mandate that governments tie their economies in knots to meet arbitrary emission goals to save the planet. The Senate has not and won't ratify any of those either.

Yet a president who pays no attention to Congress or the Constitution has through Environmental Protection Agency regulations sought to impose Kyoto and cap-and-trade through regulation and fiat.

The Orwellian-named United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, which has disarmed none of the world's tyrants or terrorists, has announced on its website that the ATT will take effect on Christmas Eve, a lump of coal in the stockings of anyone who believes, as our Founding Fathers did when they wrote the Second Amendment, that guns in the hands of private citizens are the best defense against predators, terrorists and, yes, tyrannical governments.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 2a; 2ndamendment; armstradetreaty; banglist; bhofacism; donttreadonme; firearms; gunconfiscation; guncontrol; gungrab; gunregistration; gunrights; guns; ibd; ibdguns; johnkerry; kerry; nra; rkba; rtkba; secondamendment; smallarmstreaty; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: KarlInOhio
The new senate needs to pull out the pile of unratified treaties and vote them down.

True. Still, we voted down the UN Convention on Biodiversity and the courts still respect its tenets in American law, such as listing subspecies or "evolutionarily significant units."

21 posted on 11/13/2014 3:48:18 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SisterK

The cops don’t view themselves as civilians. Just like the NSA views private contracts as better than the constitution


22 posted on 11/13/2014 4:44:10 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
NO $ALE The Treaty would have been meaningless in the USA, but the Senate passed the Amendment to stop the U.S.A. from joining it anyway.

Senate votes 53-46 to stop US from joining UN Arms Trade Treaty
http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/in-the-news/2013/3/senate-votes-53-46-to-stop-us-from-joining-un-arms-trade-treaty.aspx


23 posted on 11/13/2014 4:50:17 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Gun Shop Owner to Vets: 'You NEVER FOUGHT FOR ANY OF MY FREEDOMS!!!!!'
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3226359/posts

Alabamian’s anti-veterans rant lands him in serious hot water
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3226454/posts


24 posted on 11/13/2014 4:52:15 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking; StopGlobalWhining; Straight Vermonter; Tampa Caver; TChris; ...

U.N. GUN GRAB PING


25 posted on 11/13/2014 5:55:53 PM PST by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken or facebook.com/danielsobieski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

The problem is, that there are many in the electorate who love what he/they are doing.

Amazing.

IMHO


26 posted on 11/13/2014 6:29:39 PM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCW

Foreign troops.
Foreign troops would be happy to comply.


27 posted on 11/13/2014 8:28:48 PM PST by SisterK (we are being set up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

All of these climate and arms treaties are meant to effect one country, is the US. Only the US is stupid enough to think they mean something.


28 posted on 11/13/2014 8:30:57 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

I thought that biden signed us on to the deal. Illegally.


29 posted on 11/13/2014 8:31:55 PM PST by SisterK (we are being set up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

treaties are not law and any treaty that violates US law is null and void


30 posted on 11/13/2014 8:31:56 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Unfortunately Obama uses EO’s to abide by these ungratified treaties, whether they are voted down or not


31 posted on 11/13/2014 8:33:17 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SisterK
...they will NOT be using local law enforcement to take away Americans’ weapons.

Likely foreign "peacekeepers", which can be called in in the case of armed conflict.

32 posted on 11/14/2014 12:33:58 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BCW
No law or treaty may trump the Constitution no matter how ill informed people are.
Any that does impede is considered null from inception.
33 posted on 11/14/2014 12:55:44 AM PST by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SisterK
Foreign troops coming to take my guns? I'll find it very difficult masking my glee.
34 posted on 11/14/2014 12:58:07 AM PST by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SisterK

Foreign troops = foreign enemy - I am oath bound to kill them and protect the US Constitution.

Let them come and I and others like me will shove their faces in the ground and make widows of their wives!

But then again, not even foreign troops would dare land here in the US and try such a stupid task. The world knows that the US Citizen is one that is heavily armed and prior experience either in local hunting or military or both - and they aren’t going to attempt it. There will be no Red Dawn here.


35 posted on 11/14/2014 2:34:33 AM PST by BCW (ARMIS EXPOSCERE PACEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SisterK

Foreign troops = foreign enemy - I am oath bound to kill them and protect the US Constitution.

Let them come and I and others like me will shove their faces in the ground and make widows of their wives!

But then again, not even foreign troops would dare land here in the US and try such a stupid task. The world knows that the US Citizen is one that is heavily armed and prior experience either in local hunting or military or both - and they aren’t going to attempt it. There will be no Red Dawn here.


36 posted on 11/14/2014 2:35:03 AM PST by BCW (ARMIS EXPOSCERE PACEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

100% agree!


37 posted on 11/14/2014 2:36:49 AM PST by BCW (ARMIS EXPOSCERE PACEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
treaties are not law and any treaty that violates US law is null and void

You can wave your hand all you want, but they will still be enforced by every level of government. BTW, the Supremacy Clause may not say what you think it does. The commas are a problem.

38 posted on 11/14/2014 10:12:13 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax
No law or treaty may trump the Constitution no matter how ill informed people are. Any that does impede is considered null from inception.

Poppycock. We have treaties on the books now that are enforced that wildly exceed the scope of Constitutionally enumerated powers. That is why, for example, treaties are cited specifically as authority in USC Title XVI, Section 1531.

39 posted on 11/14/2014 10:14:15 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

“We have treaties on the books now that are enforced that wildly exceed the scope of Constitutionally enumerated powers.”

If true, and I’m not saying it isn’t, then this is a great wrong.


40 posted on 11/14/2014 10:35:46 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson